Connect with us

Uncategorized

Families Of Texas School Shooting Victims Sue Gunmaker, Instagram

Published

on

Spread the love

Several families whose children were killed or wounded in a mass shooting at their Texas school two years ago have sued the gun manufacturer as well as Instagram and video game company Activision for marketing the weapon, their lawyer said Friday.

 

 

Nineteen young children and two teachers were killed in the city of Uvalde on May 24, 2022 when a teenage gunman went on a rampage with an AR-15 style assault rifle at Robb Elementary School, in America’s deadliest school shooting in a decade.

 

memorial-for-the-victims-of-the-Robb-Elementary-School-shooting-in-Uvalde-Texas-Us-Texas-School-Crime-Uvalde-2.jpg

 

The families accuse the companies of wrongful death and gross negligence, saying gun manufacturer Daniel Defense, as well as Meta-owned Instagram and Microsoft-owned Activision, whose “Call of Duty” video game features the weapon, marketed it to “insecure, adolescent boys,” according to a statement from lawyer Josh Koskoff.

 

 

Koskoff insisted there was a direct line between the companies’ conduct and the Uvalde shooting because the gunman purchased the weapon immediately after turning 18, the legal age in Texas to purchase long guns such as rifles.

 

 

“Well before he was old enough to purchase it, he was targeted and cultivated online by Instagram, Activision and Daniel Defense,” Koskoff said in his statement.

 

 

“This three-headed monster knowingly exposed him to the weapon, conditioned him to see it as a tool to solve his problems and trained him to use it.”

 

 

Activision issued a statement saying the Uvalde shooting was “horrendous and heartbreaking in every way” and expressed sympathies to the families.

 

 

It added: “Millions of people around the world enjoy video games without turning to horrific acts.”

 

Meta and Daniel Defense did not immediately respond to AFP’s request for comment.

 

 

Earlier this week, Uvalde families reached a $2 million settlement with the Texas city over what the Justice Department called “critical failures” by police in responding to the shooting.

 

 

Officers eventually shot and killed the gunman but waited more than an hour before storming the classroom where he was holed up.

 

 

School shootings have become a regular occurrence in a country where about a third of adults own a firearm and regulations on purchasing even powerful military style rifles are lax

 

 

Uncategorized

Saka Drags Critics Over Arsenal’s Title Win

Published

on

Spread the love

Bukayo Saka said that Arsenal’s critics were “not laughing at us anymore” as the club celebrated their first Premier League title in more than two decades.

 

Gunners players and staff gathered at the club’s London Colney training ground on Tuesday to watch closest challengers Manchester City draw 1-1 away to Bournemouth—a result which gave Arsenal an unassailable four-point lead at the top of the table with just Sunday’s final round of matches remaining.

As the Arsenal squad relished the club’s first Premier League title since 2004, there were also joyous scenes at the north London side’s Emirates Stadium, where thousands of supporters gathered to mark the occasion by lighting fireworks and flares.

Arsenal, runners-up in the league for the previous three seasons, had faced accusations of “bottling” their title bid, with several observers questioning their temperament and ability to handle pressure following a 2-1 defeat at City on April 19.

But while City subsequently drew at Everton and then at Bournemouth, Arsenal won their next four league games without conceding a goal.

Arteta, who rejoined Arsenal as manager in December 2019 with the club in dire straits, installed a blacked-out Premier League trophy at Colney which would light up only when the Gunners won the title

“Light that up,” Saka said in footage posted by defender Jurrien Timber on his Instagram account.

“Let me tell you something. Twenty-two years, 22 years. there was laughing, there was joking, they’re not laughing anymore,” the England international added. “Look, it is going to be shining, it is going to be shining bright.”

In an Instagram post, this time on Saka’s channel, Arsenal’s Myles Lewis-Skelly was seen holding a champagne bottle.

“They called us bottlers,” said Lewis-Skelly who, like Saka, came through the club’s Hale End Academy youth system. “And now we’re holding the bottle.”

Former Arsenal manager Arsene Wenger featured in a celebratory post put out by his old side.

The Frenchman, who won three Premier League titles with the Gunners, including the 2004 ‘Invincibles’, said: “You did it. Champions go on when others stop. This is your time. Now, go on and enjoy every moment.”

City manager Pep Guardiola, who had Arteta as his assistant for two of the Manchester club’s league titles, paid tribute to his fellow Spaniard.

“On behalf of everyone at Manchester City, we congratulate Mikel and all the staff, players and fans on winning the Premier League,” Guardiola told Sky Sports. “They deserve it, for so much hard work and effort.”

Arsenal will be presented with the Premier League trophy after their final match of the domestic season at Crystal Palace on Sunday.

The Gunners could yet end the campaign with an impressive double when they go in search of their first Champions League title against Paris Saint-Germain in a Budapest final on May 30.

 

AFP

Continue Reading

News

Group Petitions Remi Tinubu Over Women Neglect In Oshodi/Isolo, Wants AYA For Reps

Published

on

Spread the love

A women right group, ‘The Women Advocates’ (TWA) has petitioned the First Lady, Sen. Oluremi Tinubu over male domination of elective and appointive positions in Oshodi/Isolo Federal Constituency II ahead of the forthcoming primaries of the All Progressive Congress (APC) in Lagos State.

 

In a petition addressed to the wife of the president, the group sought the intervention of the First Lady over what it described as total neglect of the women folks in aspiring for the House of Representatives seat from the constituency.

The group in the petition which was jointly signed by its coordinator, Adejoke Olaogun and Secretary Helen Nwachukwu respectively noted with dismay that since the advent of the second republic in 1999, no female politician has been given the opportunity to represent the constituency at the House of Representatives.

The group listed six male politicians who have represented the constituency to include Gbolahan Okuneye, Jaiyeola Ajatta, Hakeem Muniru, Tony Nwulu, Ganiu Johnson and now currently Okey Joe Onuakalusi.

The Women Advocates said the total domination of elective and appointive positions by male politicians in the constituency negates the gender equality and all-inclusive principle of President Bola Ahmed Tinubu who recently supported constitutional amendment initiated by the National Assembly for increased women’s participation in governance by advocating for at least 35% affirmative action in elective and appointive positions.

The initiative of the National Assembly also gained the affirmation of the ruling party, All Progressive Congress APC (APC) which officially pushed for reduced political hostility, greater inclusion in leadership and also introduced initiatives like ‘774 Explore’ for grassroot mobilization, aiming to boost female representation ahead of the 2027 elections.

“For this obvious gender imbalance, we are constrained to seek your intervention in addressing this anomaly. Being gender-friendly and a strong advocate of women’s inclusion in governance, we are convinced your timely intervention would restore hope of leadership opportunities for the women folks who are expectedly to mobilize extensively for the re-election bid of the president in 2027,” the petition read in part.

It continued: “To this end, we earnestly solicit consideration of female aspirants as APC candidates in a fair and equitable manner ahead of the forthcoming party primaries across the 25 LGAs and 37 LCDAs in Lagos particularly in Oshodi/Isolo Federal Constituency II where we lost the last House of Representatives election to the Labour Party (LP).”

The group specifically appealed for support for Angela Yinka Akintunde as a candidate for the House of Representatives seat in Oshodi-Isolo Federal Constituency II, describing her candidacy as a step toward bridging the gender gap in elective offices.

Women Advocates further urged party leaders and stakeholders to embrace inclusivity and fairness in the forthcoming primaries, emphasizing that equitable representation would enhance political development and social progress in the state

Continue Reading

Uncategorized

Between ADC, INEC And Rule Of law –By Thomas Akor

Published

on

Spread the love

Since the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) suspended recognition of all leadership factions in the African Democratic Congress (ADC) following a ruling by the Court of Appeal and ongoing litigation over the party’s leadership, the polity has been on edge. That is understandable given the status of the party as an emerging opposition platform.

 

In a statement by its spokesperson, Mohammed Haruna, the electoral commission hinged its decision on an order by the Court of Appeal. In obedience to the court order, the commission decided to stop engaging with any of the two warring factions until there is a substantive court judgement after it received conflicting letters demanding recognition from both sides. Pointedly, the judgement did not favour the faction led by David Mark, prompting INEC to decline recognition of his chairmanship.

The point, then, is that the court ruling of the Appeal Court undermines the legitimacy of David Mark’s leadership, and INEC’s position reinforces the legal effect of the judgement, effectively limiting his authority in dealing with the electoral body. To say that the decision places the party in a contested leadership situation, pending possible appeals or internal resolution, is to put it very mildly.

Not just ahead of the 2027 general election but in politics generally, it is a no-brainer that internal divisions impair coordinated campaign efforts across states. If the ADC refuses to put its house in order, it risks disintegration and utter irrelevance, both in the build up to the election and thereafter.

Disputes over legitimate party leadership will inevitably lead to conflicting candidate lists, risking disqualification or exclusion from ballots. Besides, the party’s ability to form alliances or coalitions ahead of elections will be significantly diminished. If the party continues to present a picture of instability, voters will simply look the other way.

The question they would be asking themselves is how a party that cannot properly organise, harmonise and manage its internal issues can hope to govern Nigeria effectively. The inescapable conclusion, given ADC’s antics so far, is that it is not prepared for the 2027 polls but is only interested in bickering and wrangling, intent on leading Nigerians, particularly undecided or swing voters, down a slippery slope.

If unresolved before key electoral deadlines, the ADC risks reduced participation or irrelevance in the forthcoming elections. The party is likely to experience operational disruptions unless a legally recognized leadership emerges quickly. Its performance may decline significantly in comparison to more stable parties, unless the crisis is resolved and unity restored.

The best-Case Scenario would be for swift judicial clarification or internal reconciliation restores leadership legitimacy and stabilizes party operations, while the worst-case scenario would be prolonged litigation and factional conflict result in parallel structures, disqualification risks, and electoral underperformance.

The court ruling and INEC’s response represent a critical inflection point for the African Democratic Congress. Without rapid resolution, the party faces a high-risk trajectory that could significantly undermine its competitiveness in the forthcoming elections.

The genesis of the current crisis plaguing the party is the decision by a member of the National Working Committee (NWC) of the party to drag its factional chairman, Senator David Mark to the Federal High Court, seeking an ex parte order. The judge didn’t grant it outright. Instead, he asked Mark to come and show cause why the request shouldn’t be approved.

Rather than argue his case at that court, the former Senate President proceeded to the Court of Appeal. The appellate court was clear: go back to the Federal High Court and argue your case. More importantly, the Court of Appeal cautioned INEC not to take any action that could render the pending suit useless. In simple terms “dont recognize anybody”. Not Mark. Not Nafiu. No faction

.Until the court settles the leadership tussle, there is officially no recognized leadership. INEC didn’t pick sides; it simply obeyed the court. However, in their typical manner, members of the party have been clutching at straws, accusing the electoral body of bias when the real bias and lack of objectivity lies within their own ranks. Rather than going through the legal process dictated by the laws of the land, they have been scheduling press conferences, issuing acerbic statements, and attempting to reap political capital from their own self-inflicted wounds. This move is, for want of a better position, patently illogical.

To the extent that INEC’s action is in tandem with the orders of court, to that extent is its position grouned in law, logic and democratic ethos. There is no basis for an alternative conclusion at the moment.

 

 

Thomas Akor a public analyst sent this piece from Gboko, Benue State

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2026 TheColumn NG