Connect with us

Uncategorized

US Senate Passes Ukraine Aid Bill, House Likely To Reject It

Published

on

Spread the love

The US Senate on Tuesday approved long-delayed funding for Ukraine’s war effort, part of a foreign aid package that right-wing House Speaker Mike Johnson has indicated his Republican-led chamber will reject.

 

US Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, Democrat from New York, departs after speaking during a news conference at the US Capitol on February 13, 2024, in Washington, DC. The US Senate on February 13, 2024 approved $60 billion in funding for Ukraine, in a bill House Speaker Mike Johnson has indicated his Republican-led chamber will reject. (Photo by Mandel NGAN / AFP)

 

Republican and Democratic lawmakers have been negotiating the national security measure for months, but strong opposition from likely Republican 2024 presidential nominee Donald Trump and his allies in Congress still threatens to sink it.

 

 

The $95 billion package includes funding for Israel’s military and key strategic ally Taiwan, but the lion’s share — $60 billion — would help Ukraine restock depleted ammunition supplies, weapons and other crucial needs as it enters a third year of war against Russian invasion.

 

 

The legislation, which the Senate voted on early Tuesday morning and which easily passed 70-29 with cross-party support, is the latest effort in a tortuous process to save President Joe Biden’s policy of leading a Western response to the Russian attack on democratic Ukraine.

 

 

A previous Senate bill negotiated by both parties had also encompassed tough new US border protections aimed at stemming an influx of migration into the United States from Mexico — a demand from Republicans, who said they would not help Ukraine without first paying attention to the domestic issue.

 

 

However, Trump-led Republicans in Congress then killed that bill, leaving the legislature in chaos.

 

 

Johnson suggested late Monday that even if Republicans in the Senate backed the Ukraine bill, the party in the lower house will not follow — unless, again, it comes with border control measures.

 

 

“House Republicans were crystal clear from the very beginning of discussions that any so-called national security supplemental legislation must recognize that national security begins at our own border,” Johnson said in a statement.

 

 

This came despite Johnson previously rejecting the Senate’s first bill, which included some of the harshest immigration curbs in decades, but which he said still did not go far enough.

 

 

The Republican maneuvers to prevent both border measures and Ukraine aid from passing in Congress follow the lead of Trump, who is campaigning heavily on the border problems — while opposing help for Ukraine’s fight against Russia.

 

 

Senate Democrats, led by Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, have now set up a major showdown on the issues by getting the foreign aid bill passed and sent to the House.

 

– Republican divisions –

 

The Republican logjam over the bill comes amid both disunity within the party and desire on the right wing to keep the border an open issue leading into the election.

 

 

Given Trump’s domination of the party, it meant top Senate Republican Mitch McConnell had to step out of line in marshalling support during the overnight debate ahead of Tuesday’s vote.

 

 

McConnell had urged his colleagues to reject the Trump-favored isolationist approach and to consider the message it would send if the United States failed to support Ukraine and other democracies.

 

 

“Our adversaries want America to decide that reinforcing allies and partners is not in our interest, and that investing in strategic competition is not worth it,” McConnell said in a statement after Tuesday’s vote.

 

 

“Today, on the value of American leadership and strength, history will record that the Senate did not blink.”

 

 

Trump’s acolytes in the Senate, however, only highlighted the divisions among Republicans and how a significant faction of the party is turning inward.

 

 

“Today we make (Russian President) Vladimir Putin regret the day he questioned America’s resolve,” Schumer said on the Senate floor, adding that if Johnson allowed the bill to go to a House vote, “it will pass with the same strong bipartisan support.”

 

 

 

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky expressed gratitude for the aid measure’s advancement despite its uncertain fate in the House, taking to social media to thank “every US Senator who has supported continued assistance to Ukraine as we fight for freedom, democracy, and the values we all hold dear.”

 

“We must fix our country before devoting more resources to Ukraine,” Senator J.D. Vance, a strong Trump backer, said on X. “That’s our message, and the fight goes on.”

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

AFP

 

 

News

Police Detain Woman In Place Of Wanted Brother, Allegedly Collect N600,000 –Petition

Published

on

Spread the love

 

The Rule of Law and Accountability Advocacy Centre (RULAAC) has petitioned the Anambra State Commissioner of Police over the alleged unlawful arrest and four-day detention of a woman by operatives of the Rapid Response Squad (RRS), Awkuzu, formerly known as the Special Anti-Robbery Squad (SARS).

 

RULAAC, in a letter signed by its Executive Director, Okechukwu Nwanguma, dated September 5, alleged that Ms. Nwosu Chikamso Jennifer was arrested on August 31, 2026, not over an offence linked to her but in connection with the police search for her brother, who is reportedly wanted over an alleged murder case.

According to the organisation, Nwosu alleged that she was detained for four days and was expected to produce her brother despite not being accused of complicity in the alleged offence.

The organisation said Nwosu further alleged that she was released on September 3 after ₦600,000 was paid, with the payment allegedly described as being for “administrative bail.”

RULAAC said no receipt or acknowledgement was reportedly issued for the payment.

The complainant also alleged that her mobile phone was seized by the police and retained without a seizure form or property receipt.

The organisation identified the investigating officer in the matter as Mr Odoh Kingsley of RRS Awkuzu.

RULAAC said Nwosu had been directed to report again on Monday, September 7, 2026, but was apprehensive that she could face renewed detention or further demands for money.

The rights group therefore called on the Commissioner of Police to urgently intervene and verify the allegations before Nwosu’s scheduled appearance at the police facility.

RULAAC described the alleged arrest and detention of Nwosu over her brother’s alleged offence as a possible case of “arrest by proxy” or “arrest in lieu.”

The organisation argued that arresting a person merely to compel the surrender of a relative raises serious constitutional and human-rights concerns.

“If the claims are substantially correct, the actions complained of would raise grave legal and human-rights concerns,” the organisation said.

“Arresting and detaining a person merely to compel the surrender of a relative amounts to arrest by proxy or arrest in lieu, a practice expressly prohibited by Nigerian law.”

RULAAC also raised concerns about the alleged four-day detention, saying that holding a person beyond the constitutionally permissible period without taking the individual before a court could violate legal safeguards on arrest and detention.

It further described the alleged ₦600,000 payment as “particularly disturbing,” stressing that police bail is free.

The organisation said the allegations were particularly concerning because they involved the Awkuzu facility, which became notorious for alleged human rights abuses during the era of SARS.

RULAAC said the transition from SARS to RRS should have represented more than a change of name.

“These allegations, if established, inevitably evoke the ugly memories of the abuses historically associated with the former SARS facility at Awkuzu,” the organisation said.

“The transition from SARS to RRS ought to signify more than a change of name; it should represent a decisive institutional break from arbitrary detention, arrest by proxy, extortion and other practices that brought the former unit into disrepute.”

RULAAC said the alleged conduct, if established, would be inconsistent with safeguards contained in the Nigerian Constitution, the Police Act 2020 and applicable criminal justice legislation.

In its requests to the Commissioner of Police, RULAAC asked the police authorities to establish the circumstances and legal basis for Nwosu’s arrest and four-day detention.

It also demanded an investigation into the alleged ₦600,000 payment, including determining who allegedly demanded or received the money.

The organisation requested that the money be refunded if it was found to have been unlawfully collected.

RULAAC further asked the police to establish the legal basis for the seizure and continued retention of Nwosu’s phone and ensure that any property retained for investigative purposes is properly documented.

It also urged the police to ensure that Nwosu’s scheduled appearance on September 7 would not result in further arbitrary detention, intimidation or unlawful financial demands.

The organisation asked the police to ensure that Nwosu was not held responsible for producing her brother or punished for his alleged conduct without evidence establishing her own involvement in an offence.

It also called for disciplinary or other appropriate action against any police officer found to have acted unlawfully.

The rights organisation stressed that it recognised the responsibility of the police to investigate serious crimes, including murder allegations.

It said its intervention was not intended to obstruct the investigation into Nwosu’s brother.

“Nothing in this intervention is intended to obstruct any lawful investigation,” RULAAC said.

“Our concern is simply that the investigation must be conducted within the bounds of the law and that no citizen should be deprived of liberty or subjected to financial demands merely because the Police are seeking a relative.”

The organisation urged the police command to respond to the complaint and disclose the steps taken to address the allegations.

Continue Reading

International News

Maguire: Tuchel Told Me By Video Call I Was Out And I Said I Was Very Disappointed

Published

on

Spread the love

 

On “The Rest is Football” podcast, Manchester United center-back Maguire discussed how Tuchel informed him via video call that he had not been selected for the World Cup squad.

 

Maguire revealed: “He (Tuchel) video-called everyone. It was quite an awkward call. I first received a message asking if he could talk to me around 4 PM. It was quite a unique approach, and certainly difficult, because he could see everyone’s reactions.

“I said directly that I was really very disappointed. I felt I had done well enough to deserve to be in the squad, and I felt I could have helped the team, playing a role on and off the pitch. He said he couldn’t give me any excuses, but he chose the four players who had helped him through a difficult period last autumn.

“It was hard to accept. After being called up by him for the first time in the March training camp, I did think I would be in the squad. I performed well in both games and then returned to Manchester United, finishing the season with a very strong performance.”

Tuchel ultimately chose to take Stones, Guehi, Konsa, Quansah, and Dan Burn to the World Cup.

No Plans to Retire from England Duty
Furthermore, even with Tuchel’s contract extending to Euro 2028, Maguire is unwilling to close the door on playing for England.

He added: “I don’t think I’ll retire from England duty. I still feel I can shine. Sooner or later there will be a time and a point where I no longer deserve to be selected for England, but even then, I most likely won’t proactively step out and announce my retirement. If I can play for England one more time, it will all be worth it.”

Maguire will use the off-season to fully recover and prepare for Manchester United’s return to the Champions League in the 2026-27 season. While his England teammates face the immense pressure of a major international tournament, the experienced defender will strive to maintain his excellent club form. If he is to earn a recall to the England squad later this year, proving his endurance in the Premier League remains crucial.

Continue Reading

Uncategorized

Saka Drags Critics Over Arsenal’s Title Win

Published

on

Spread the love

Bukayo Saka said that Arsenal’s critics were “not laughing at us anymore” as the club celebrated their first Premier League title in more than two decades.

 

Gunners players and staff gathered at the club’s London Colney training ground on Tuesday to watch closest challengers Manchester City draw 1-1 away to Bournemouth—a result which gave Arsenal an unassailable four-point lead at the top of the table with just Sunday’s final round of matches remaining.

As the Arsenal squad relished the club’s first Premier League title since 2004, there were also joyous scenes at the north London side’s Emirates Stadium, where thousands of supporters gathered to mark the occasion by lighting fireworks and flares.

Arsenal, runners-up in the league for the previous three seasons, had faced accusations of “bottling” their title bid, with several observers questioning their temperament and ability to handle pressure following a 2-1 defeat at City on April 19.

But while City subsequently drew at Everton and then at Bournemouth, Arsenal won their next four league games without conceding a goal.

Arteta, who rejoined Arsenal as manager in December 2019 with the club in dire straits, installed a blacked-out Premier League trophy at Colney which would light up only when the Gunners won the title

“Light that up,” Saka said in footage posted by defender Jurrien Timber on his Instagram account.

“Let me tell you something. Twenty-two years, 22 years. there was laughing, there was joking, they’re not laughing anymore,” the England international added. “Look, it is going to be shining, it is going to be shining bright.”

In an Instagram post, this time on Saka’s channel, Arsenal’s Myles Lewis-Skelly was seen holding a champagne bottle.

“They called us bottlers,” said Lewis-Skelly who, like Saka, came through the club’s Hale End Academy youth system. “And now we’re holding the bottle.”

Former Arsenal manager Arsene Wenger featured in a celebratory post put out by his old side.

The Frenchman, who won three Premier League titles with the Gunners, including the 2004 ‘Invincibles’, said: “You did it. Champions go on when others stop. This is your time. Now, go on and enjoy every moment.”

City manager Pep Guardiola, who had Arteta as his assistant for two of the Manchester club’s league titles, paid tribute to his fellow Spaniard.

“On behalf of everyone at Manchester City, we congratulate Mikel and all the staff, players and fans on winning the Premier League,” Guardiola told Sky Sports. “They deserve it, for so much hard work and effort.”

Arsenal will be presented with the Premier League trophy after their final match of the domestic season at Crystal Palace on Sunday.

The Gunners could yet end the campaign with an impressive double when they go in search of their first Champions League title against Paris Saint-Germain in a Budapest final on May 30.

 

AFP

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2026 TheColumn NG