Connect with us

News

Just In: Rumpus As Lagos Assembly Stops Govt Appointees Salaries

Published

on

Spread the love

Summons HoS, Accountant-General, Commissioner. –

orders withdrawal of appointment letters to affected appointees

 

The Lagos State House of Assembly on Tuesday ( today) ordered the withdrawal of letters given to government appointees whose nominations should have been sent to the House for their screening and confirmation, but who took up the jobs without the due process.

 

The House also ordered immediate halting of salaries and remunerations enjoyed by the affected government appointees pending their appearances before the House. The Assembly further summoned three top officials over the issue.

 

Those summoned include the Head of Service, Mr. Hakeem Muri-Okunola, the Accountant-General of the State, Dr. Abiodun Muritala, and the state’s Commissioner for Establishment, Mrs. Ajibola Ponnle.

 

In a ‘Matter of Urgent Public Importance’ brought before the House by Hon. Noheem Adams, Deputy Majority Leader, the lawmakers lamented the increasing situation where supposed nominees of the governor continue to work without being screened and confirmed by the House

 

Speaker Mudashiru Obasa, who presided at the sitting, agreed with the lawmakers that appointments of that nature without recourse to the House amounted to infractions.

 

“I quite agree with all of you that the failure of such nominees to appear is an infraction or violation of the laws of this House, especially as it relates to the MDAs, most of which were established by the laws of this House,” Dr. Obasa said adding that the laws of the House of Assembly have statutory provisions that nominees of the governor must appear for confirmation.

 

“It is becoming common and regular and if we fail to act now, it becomes a norm. I share your sentiments that there is a need for us to put a stop to this. I am aware of the development in the Audit Commission, I am aware of the one in the Law Reform Commission and now the Auditor-General and some others,” he said.

 

Raising the issue earlier, Hon. Adams cited Section 196, subsection 2; Section 198 and Section 126, subsection 3 which give backing to the House of Assembly in respect of nominations by the governor for appointments.

 

“Section 126, subsection 3 provides that except with the resolution of a State Assembly, no person shall act in the office of the Auditor-General for a state for a period exceeding six months.

 

“As the chairman, House committee on legislative compliance, I have observed that some appointments to boards and other agencies were not brought to this noble House. If this persists, the principle of separation of powers will be in jeopardy.

 

“For example, the Auditor-General was appointed on the September 22, 2022 and today is April 11, 2023,” Adams said adding that the Auditor-General’s appointment in acting capacity had exceeded what the laws stipulate.

 

Supporting Adams, Hon. Ademola Kasunmu said the stipulations of Section 198 should be strictly adhered to. He added that because such appointments are considered null and void, every remuneration that had gone out, should be returned to the coffers of the State.

 

Speaking on the same matter, Hon. Victor Akande observed that the situation happened in the judiciary where an appointment was done without recourse to the House and the due process.

 

Hon. Sa’ad Olumoh lamented that such appointments without regard for the House were becoming too many.

 

“Separation of power is a doctrine enshrined in the constitution. The executive has the right to nominate people and the House has the responsibility to either confirm or reject such nominations.

 

“It is not only in the office of the Auditor-General, but I don’t know in what capacity one can act beyond the time limit without recourse to the House,” he said while urging the House to look at the issue holistically so as to put an end to what could cause issues later.

 

Hon. Rotimi Olowo, who noted the difference between nomination and appointment, lamented: “Today, we have a lot of people parading themselves with many names without appearing before this House for clearance. It should not be a padi-padi thing. This is a constitutional matter and if we do not adhere, we would end up facing the wrought of the people.”

 

He said it was an infraction to have people who are not cleared by the House receiving salaries and “I am of the opinion that such money is supposed to be returned to the coffers.”

 

Hon. Desmond Elliot called on the House to act in a way to curtail any future occurrence while Hon. Femi Saheed suggested that “in line with the constitution, anyone acting outside the stipulated time must recourse to the House.”

He further suggested that the Head of Service be made to appear before the House to clear himself over the issue.

 

News

Landlord Arraigned For Setting Tenant’s Property On Fire

Published

on

Spread the love

 

An 18-year-old landlord, Similoluwa Akande, has been arraigned before an Akungba-Akoko Magistrate’s Court in Ondo State for allegedly setting fire to a tenant’s belongings valued at N898,000.

Akande was docked on a four-count charge bordering on felony following the incident, which reportedly occurred on August 19, 2026, at Okusa in Akungba-Akoko.

According to the police prosecutor, Olasunkanmi Boboye, the defendant allegedly set ablaze property belonging to his tenant, Aseluwa Ezekiel.

The items destroyed included a bed, bed frame, clothes, carpet, gas cylinder, travelling box, shoes, curtains, rods and cash.

The prosecutor told the court that the burnt items were valued at N898,000, while some official documents were also reportedly destroyed in the fire.

Boboye said the alleged offences contravened Section 249(D) of the Criminal Code, Cap. 37, Vol. 1, Laws of Ondo State of Nigeria, 2006.

The defendant pleaded not guilty to the charges when they were read to him.

He was not represented by legal counsel and informed the court that he had health challenges.

Presiding Magistrate Kolapo Kolawole granted the defendant bail in the sum of N500,000 and adjourned the matter until September 9, 2026, for hearing.

Continue Reading

News

Stop Giving Motorcycles As Palliatives, Defence Minister Tells Governors

Published

on

Spread the love

 

The Minister of Defence, Gen. Christopher Musa (retd.), on Thursday said terrorists are using motorcycles given to Nigerians as palliatives to wreak havoc across the country.

 

He, however, advised the state governors and lawmakers to stop giving motorcycles as palliatives, arguing that some of the motorcycles eventually end up in the hands of terrorists to facilitate and enhance their nefarious activities.

Musa, who stated this when he appeared on Channels Television’s Politics Today, said efforts are being made to curb terrorism and the operational challenges confronting the country’s security forces.

“We try to appeal to even governors to stop giving motorcycles out as palliatives. Because these motorcycles are the same ones that still end up with these terrorist

“Even if you have to give, don’t give them the big capacity motorcycles; give them the small capacity ones that they won’t be able to use to run around, because that gives them leverage. They can easily enter and then disappear,” he said.

The minister also warned that motorcycles distributed through constituency projects and other palliative programmes by lawmakers could find their way back to bandits and terrorists.

“Those bikes… before you know it, they’re already back to the bandits, and that’s what they’re using. So we must stop that,” he said.

According to him, security agencies had identified illegal markets and motor parks as channels through which terrorists move arms and ammunition into areas where they operate.

“What we realise from experience is they establish illegal markets or illicit motor parks. They go to those motor parks; that’s where they move arms and ammunition into those areas,” he added.

The defence minister also called for greater involvement of local governments in tackling insecurity, saying their proximity to communities gives them an advantage in identifying criminals and preventing crime.

“We must allow our local governments to work. Failure of local government is what is aggravating what we’re dealing with, and if we want a better solution, a quick fix, our local governments must work.

“Crime and development are local. If every local government chairman is dealing with criminals within his locality, it’s easier to manage them than leaving it to the state or to the federal,” he said.

Musa said local government chairmen should hold regular security meetings and report developments in their areas.

He further urged state and local authorities to strengthen monitoring of markets, motor parks and other locations through which drugs, weapons and ammunition could be moved.

“If we’re able to make sure that we man all the markets, all the motor parks, all these areas where drugs, weapons, ammunition move, it will make it difficult for them,” he added.

Continue Reading

News

About 50 Inmates Have Been On Awaiting Trial For 10 Years In Akwa Ibom –Report

Published

on

Spread the love

 

At least 49 inmates at the Medium Security Correctional Centre in Eket, Akwa Ibom State, have reportedly spent more than a decade awaiting trial, exposing the human cost of prolonged detention and delays in Nigeria’s criminal justice system.

 

Sources inside the facility disclosed the figure during an inspection of the centre on September 2, 2026.

According to the sources, some of the inmates have spent more than 10 years in custody without their cases being concluded, while others allegedly face difficulties because their case files are unavailable.

Some inmates were reportedly arrested over relatively minor offences, while sources also alleged that others were detained in connection with activism.

The prolonged detention means that people who have not been convicted of the offences for which they were arrested have spent years behind bars.

The situation is particularly troubling because the Nigerian Constitution guarantees the right to a fair hearing within a reasonable time.

The problem is not entirely new at Eket.

In 2023, the Akwa Ibom Chief Judge released six inmates from the facility after finding that they had spent between two and three years in custody without case files to charge them to court.

In March 2026, another eight inmates were released from Eket during a jail-delivery exercise conducted by the state Chief Judge, with the judiciary citing compassionate grounds and want of prosecution.

The Chief Judge has repeatedly raised concerns about prolonged detention.

In March, Justice Ekaete Fabian-Obot said it was unconstitutional to keep suspects in custody for prolonged periods without trial.

The problem is compounded by the centre’s transportation crisis.

Transport

The Officer-in-Charge, Chief Superintendent of Corrections Samuel Bassey, recently said over 40 awaiting-trial inmates were unable to attend court because the centre had no functional vehicles.

The revelation was made on Tuesday, September 1, when a forum of Eket Federal Constituency media professionals (EFCMP), led by its Chairman, Comrade Enobong Nsimah, visited the facility to assess its condition and explore ways of providing pro bono legal assistance to inmates without legal representation.

Akwa

He said some inmates transferred to the facility from Nsit Ubium Local Government Area as far back as 2023 had never appeared in court because of the transportation problem.

“About 46 inmates are unable to appear in court. It is difficult to take the inmates to court without having operational vehicles,” Bassey said.

According to him, more than 40 inmates on the awaiting-trial list have remained at the centre because there is no functional escort van or other vehicle to transport them to court. He also disclosed that the roofs of the sections housing inmates had deteriorated badly and leaked heavily whenever it rained, leaving the inmates soaked.

In 2025, the Chief Judge released inmates across the state’s correctional facilities on grounds including excessive remand periods, lack of diligent prosecution, missing case files, health conditions and compassionate considerations. The judiciary said some inmates had already spent longer in custody than the maximum sentence they might have received if convicted.

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2026 TheColumn NG