Business
Face -Off: Nigerians Back Dangote Against PENGASSAN
Many Nigerians have opposed the planned disruption of fuel supply nationwide following the strike declared by the Petroleum and Natural Gas Senior Staff Association of Nigeria (PENGASSAN) in protest against the dismissal of some employees at the Dangote Petroleum Refinery.
This is just as the federal government has invited the leadership of PENGASSAN and the management of Dangote Refinery to an emergency meeting in Abuja today over their dispute.
The Labour ministry’s spokesperson, Patience Onuobia, in a statement yesterday, said the Minister of Labour and Employment, Maigari Dingyadi, appealed to the union to reconsider its planned strike, warning that it could have far-reaching consequences for the economy and national security.
“A strike will not only lead to heavy revenue losses by the country but also cause more hardship and difficulties for Nigerians. Consequently, it will have adverse impacts both on economic stability and national security.”
The rift between PENGASSAN and Dangote Refinery escalated over the weekend after the union accused the company of terminating the employment of hundreds of staff members who had joined the association.
The union claimed that the workers were being victimised for exercising their constitutional right to freedom of association and alleged that the refinery had replaced some of the dismissed staff with expatriates.
PENGASSAN, in a circular signed by its General Secretary, Lumumba Okugbawa, after an emergency National Executive Council meeting on Saturday, directed members in all oil and gas installations nationwide to down tools from Sunday, September 28.
Okugbawa said last night , that the strike and the meeting by the FG, with the union would be part of the meeting on Monday but added that the association had made its position known.
Meanwhile,many citizens took to the social media yesterday to express their views on the dispute.
Ben Owoleke, a power sector expert, on X said PENGASAN does not have any gas. “The gas belongs to Nigerian Government, those union guys are just employees working for Nigeria to earn their wages. Only Nigerian government should stop gas supply to Dangote Refinery. Two, the gas supply to Dangote is not free. Whether sold by NNPCL or other oil companies, Dangote pays for it. Three, it is from the payment made by Dangote Refinery that Nigeria and other coys earn some of their revenues which they use as allocation for salaries across states and LGs, also to pay salaries including the salaries of some of these saboteurs and of course, to do infrastructure and other services!”
On X (formerly Twitter), @MrGhata said: “The best way to solve and dispute is by dialogue not by compounding the problem. PENGASSAN should look at the bigger picture, not their pockets.”
@TomolaGroup: “The refinery drama in Nigeria keeps exposing the same problem. half-truths, blame games, and no accountability. Until transparency is prioritized, ordinary Nigerians will keep paying the price.”
@IamSpeacial_Kay: “We shouted monopoly would be a problem, now it’s playing out. When only one refinery holds all the power, the people have no choice but to suffer. This is the ugly face of monopoly when one man controls the market, the people pay the price.”
@thekanoblog: “Nigerians must open their eyes! Dangote’s refinery was supposed to bring relief, yet every time the people are close to breathing, forces within the government and their allies rise to frustrate it.
“Why is it that whenever progress comes for the masses, the powerful try to crush it? This is not about Dangote alone – this is about the deliberate punishment of ordinary Nigerians. We must demand accountability, because true leadership should protect the people, not sabotage their hope.”
@Sizzymirah: “Stop shifting post @DangoteGroup
You unlawfully sacked your staff for joining union. Didn’t you think of a Dialogue before taking such steps? Just stop this victim card you’re trying to play here. You think O&G is like other industries you can throw people out with poor welfare?”
On Facebook, Sajos Yusuf Illiya, said: “This problem would have long been solved if PENGASSAN were forward thinking. That much they enjoy from monopoly has been broken and they are refusing to evolve.”
Dagunduro Samuel: “Why would Dangote dismiss and sack the Nigerians’ staff simply for wanting to join a union? Don’t they have the right to belong to a union under Nigeria law?”
Taofik Tafa: “PENGASSAN, NUPENG, DAPPMAN, etc shouldn’t be allowed to ruin Dangote refinery the way they’ve ruined NNPC refineries.”
Jabes Simon: “They have a hiding motive towards this issue. Dangote can relocate to Iceland and live for 100 years without an issue. Why didn’t they shut down when ASUU was on strike? They’re not after Nigerians but rather their pockets.”
The Concerned Nigerian Consumers Forum have also asked the federal government and the Department of State Services to investigate the alleged attempts by the PENGASSAN to sabotage the Dangote Refinery.
In a statement yesterday by Olabisi Taiwo and Justice Alikor, president and secretary, respectively, the forum expressed concern over PENGASSAN’s threat to picket the refinery because of the alleged mass sackings.
It warned that such action could plunge the country back into scarcity of petroleum products, trigger economic instability and cause national embarrassment.
“Who benefits if the refinery fails?” the forum asked. “Certainly not the Nigerian people, but fuel importers and rent seekers who profit from chaos,” the forum stated.
“The government must send a clear message: industrial blackmail will not be tolerated.
“Nigerians have suffered enough from fuel queues and economic hardship. The Dangote refinery is our best chance at energy independence, and we must not allow vested interests to destroy it,” the forum said.
Business
Wema Bank Sets Record Straight on NDIC’s Misleading Gulf Bank Claims
Wema Bank Plc has noted with concern recent media publications containing false, misleading, and wholly unsubstantiated allegations regarding the sale of certain Banana Island properties purportedly linked to the defunct Gulf Bank Plc. We unequivocally reject these claims, which are inaccurate, malicious, and clearly intended to distort the true position. For the benefit of our stakeholders—shareholders, customers, regulators, and the general public—we set out below the factual background to the transaction.
The Original Exposure and Default
In 2002, Wema Bank Plc (the Bank) made an inter-bank placement with Gulf Bank Plc in the sum of ₦4.6 billion. By August 2004, that exposure had been reduced to approximately ₦1.2 billion, after which the outstanding obligation became delinquent. In seeking to recover depositors’ and shareholders’ funds, Wema Bank pursued lawful recovery steps, which ultimately dovetailed into a criminal investigation of the then Managing Director of Gulf Bank Plc.
Based on the investigation of the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC), the funds were found to have been diverted and used to acquire properties in Banana Island, Lagos, through two separate companies Bacad Finance & Investment Company Ltd (now known as Supra Commercial Trust Limited) and Euston Wenberg Eng Ltd. It is important to note that neither Bacad Finance & Investment Company Ltd (nor its successor, Supra Commercial Trust Limited) nor Euston Wenberg Eng Ltd is one and the same as Gulf Bank Plc. They are separate and distinct entities with no identity or equivalence to Gulf Bank. And the two companies are not subject to NDIC supervision.
In the course of its investigation, the EFCC conducted asset-tracing exercises that uncovered significant underlying fraud on a substantial scale. Following the EFCC’s findings, Bacad Finance & Investment Company Ltd and Euston Wenberg Eng Ltd voluntarily relinquished their proprietary interests in the Banana Island properties towards the satisfaction of Gulf Bank Indebtedness to Wema Bank. That process formed part of Wema Bank’s lawful recovery efforts and underscores the legitimacy of its actions against Gulf Bank.
NDIC’s Acknowledgment, Admission of Indebtedness, and Payment of Shortfall.
Critically, following the liquidation of Gulf Bank, Nigeria Deposit Insurance Corporation (NDIC) admitted Gulf Bank’s indebtedness to Wema Bank in two separate letters:
A letter dated September 26, 2007, addressed to the Federal Land Registry;
and
A letter dated June 10, 2009, addressed directly to Wema Bank Plc.
These letters constitute clear and formal recognition by the NDIC of the validity of Wema Bank’s claim against the defunct Gulf Bank and its interest over the property in question. Fortunately, both letters form part of the documents frontloaded by NDIC lawyer Dr. Dada Awosika SAN in court in the ongoing proceedings before Justice Allagoa of the Federal High Court Lagos.
Furthermore, after the sale of the properties, the NDIC in fact paid to Wema Bank, the shortfall of what was due to the Bank. These facts demonstrate that the NDIC was not only aware of the transaction but actively participated in settling the outstanding balance following the sale.
In light of the foregoing:
the voluntary relinquishment by Bacad (now Supra Commercial Trust Limited) and Euston Wenberg (distinct entities not constituting Gulf Bank), of the properties in Banana Island for the settlement of the indebtedness of the defunct Gulf Bank
the NDIC’s formal admission of Gulf Bank’s indebtedness to Wema Bank via its letters of September 26, 2007 (to the Federal Land Registry) and June 10, 2009 (to Wema Bank), both of which have been frontloaded in court by NDIC itself, and the acknowledgement of the relinquishment of the Banana Island properties, and
the NDIC’s own payment of the shortfall to Wema Bank,
NDIC is precluded from and cannot in good faith contest the relinquishment of those interests or the appropriateness of Wema Bank’s recovery efforts.
While we acknowledge that the NDIC has recently commenced two separate actions against Wema Bank at the Federal High Court, Lagos, purportedly in its capacity as liquidator of Gulf Bank Plc pursuant to a winding-up order, those proceedings do not alter the material facts stated above. As these matters are currently before the court and therefore sub judice, Wema Bank will refrain from commenting further on issues that fall for judicial determination. The Bank is taking all necessary steps to contest the suits filed in court and will explore all legal and legitimate means to protect its rights and interests.
Conclusion
Wema Bank Plc remains steadfast in its commitment to the highest standards of corporate governance, regulatory compliance, and transparency. We reaffirm our dedication to ethical and prudent banking practices and assure our shareholders, customers, regulators, and all relevant stakeholders that the Bank will continue to act responsibly, lawfully, and in the best interests of all parties it serves. The Bank will continue to exert its rights and will not succumb to the shenanigans of unscrupulous individuals who want to reap where they did not sow.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION:
For further information, please contact:
Johnson Lebile
General Counsel/Legal Adviser
[email protected]
About WEMA Bank Plc
Wema Bank Plc (NGX: WEMA BANK) is the pioneer of Africa’s first fully digital bank, ALAT, and one of Nigeria’s most resilient banks. With decades of experience in the business of banking, the Bank has remained innovative in delivering value to its stakeholders. Wema Bank operates a network of over 150 branches and service stations backed by a robust ICT platform. The publicly quoted Nigerian company has successfully built a legacy of trust and resilience that has won it the loyalty of its customers. The Bank is constantly introducing products and services tailored to the needs of its customers at every stage of their lives. It is a proud partner to more than one million individuals, families and businesses across Nigeria, helping them achieve their personal and financial goals.
More information can be found at https://www.wemabank.com/about-us/
Business
Food Prices May Drop By Next Harvest – Farmers
The All Farmers Association of Nigeria (AFAN) says food prices may decline by the next harvest season if governments improve security and reduce production costs for farmers.
The Deputy Chairman of AFAN, Lagos State Chapter, Mr Shakin Agbayewa, said this in an interview with the News Agency of Nigeria (NAN) on Tuesday in Lagos
Agbayewa said staple foods such as rice, yam, cassava and Garri would become more affordable if farmers could cultivate safely and access farm inputs at lower costs.
According to him, insecurity, high fertiliser prices, rising fuel costs and expensive farm operations are the major drivers of current food inflation.
“The government must be intentional and deliberate.
“Input costs are high. Fertiliser is expensive, while tractor operations cost more because of rising fuel prices. All these affect production,” he said.
Agbayewa said the high cost of cultivation, transportation and security was ultimately passed on to consumers.
He urged governments at all levels to support farmers with subsidised inputs, improved rural roads, irrigation facilities and affordable credit.
He also called for stronger collaboration with farmers’ associations to identify practical solutions tailored to the needs of each state.
According to him, increased agricultural production in the coming farming season will naturally ease pressure on market prices.
Agbayewa said Nigeria has sufficient land and manpower to feed itself if the right policies are implemented.
He added that supporting farmers remains the most sustainable path to lower food prices and economic stability.
Business
Breweries Revenue Growing Despite Economic Hardship
Against the backdrop of rising costs of living and declining purchasing power, brewing companies have recorded sharp rise in revenues.
Filings by the companies to Nigeria Exchange Limited, NGX, indicate that leading brewers, Nigerian Breweries Plc, Guinness Nigeria Plc, International Breweries Plc, and Champion Breweries Plc recorded combined revenue of over N2.8 trillion from the sale of mainly beer and spirits, in addition to their non-alcoholic beverages in the year ended December 31, 2025, up from N1.89 trillion recorded in the corresponding period of 2024, representing an increase of 48.1%.
Analysts noted that the figure underscores the scale of beer and other alcoholic beverage consumption in Nigeria despite prevailing economic pressures.
According to the financial statements of the four major brewers profit was even more impressive with Profit Before Tax (PBT) rising 117.2 percent to N317.213 billion, up from N146.050 billion in 2024.
Meanwhile, the growth rate in revenue and profit were far higher than their cost of doing business despite the inflationary pressures in the economy.
The companies’ cost of sales rose 36.5% to N1.8 trillion from N1.3trillion, while administrative expenses rose by 17.6%, to N639.8billion from N544.04 billion.
Revenue generated
Nigerian Breweries Plc, the largest brewer, recorded revenue of N1.467 trillion for the period, up from N1.084 trillion in the corresponding period of 2024, indicating a 35.3% increase.
Guinness Nigeria followed as the second-largest revenue generator in absolute terms, posting N730.808 billion, up by 144.0% from N299.489 billion in 2024. International Breweries ranked third, posting N620.149 billion, up by 26.8% from N488.955 billion in 2024, while Champion Breweries recorded the least revenue of N29.797 billion, up by 42.6% from N20.890 billion in 2024.
Profit Before Tax
A breakdown of industry profit shows that Nigerian Breweries also topped the chart in absolute terms, posting N161.062 billion, though down by 11.9% from N182.917 billion in 2024.
Trailing Nigerian Breweries is International Breweries, which recorded N85.108 billion, improving from a loss of N111.820 billion in 2024.
Guinness Nigeria ranked third with N68.392 billion, declining by 7.2% from N73.679 billion in 2024, while Champion Breweries recorded N2.651 billion, up from N1.274 billion, representing a 108.1% increase.
Cost of sales/Operating expenses
Breakdown of cost of sales shows that Nigerian Breweries recorded the highest in absolute terms at N902.239 billion, compared to N764.520 billion in 2024.
Guinness Nigeria followed with N500.326 billion against N208.031 billion in 2024; International Breweries recorded N415.707 billion from N357.605 billion, while Champion Breweries posted N14.427 billion from N12.172 billion.
Similarly, operating and administrative expenses showed that Nigerian Breweries rose by 44.7% to N361.782 billion from N249.993 billion. Guinness increased by 104.2% to N141.496 billion from N69.288 billion. International Breweries recorded N131.649 billion, down from N222.428 billion in 2024, representing a 40.8% decline, while Champion Breweries rose to N4.829 billion from N2.328 billion, up by 107.4%.
-
Health & Wellness9 months agoPresident Tinubu Directs Cut in Dialysis Cost from ₦50,000 to ₦12,000
-
News10 months agoPICTURE: In Lagos Couple Sentenced to 22½ Years for Cannabis Trafficking
-
Trending News9 months agoNELFUND Disburses ₦86bn To 449,000 Beneficiaries
-
Business2 months agoDangote Refinery Reduces Petrol Gantry Price To ₦1,200 Per Litre
-
International News2 months agoIndian Police Arrest Nigerian Over ₦290m Drug Haul
-
Business2 years agoHeritage Bank Customers’ Path to Securing ₦5m Insured Funds: A Step-By-Step Guide by NDIC”
-
Business2 months agoAfter Plea Bargain, Court Discharges Stella Oduah of ₦2.5bn Fraud
-
Business2 years ago
Dangote; We Did Not Fix ₦600/Litre Petrol Price
