News
Electoral Act: Jega Insists On Amendments Before Poll, Says President Should Not Pick INEC Chair
A former Chairman of the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC), Professor Attahiru Jega, has raised concerns over some sections of the 2026 Electoral Act, calling for urgent amendment.
He maintained that regardless of the lofty intentions of the act to add value to the integrity of elections in Nigeria, it contains “issues of serious concern” and some areas that require further contemplation in order to remove ambiguities and strengthen the efficacy of the electoral law.
Prof Jega made the observations in a paper titled “Some Reflections on the 2026 Electoral Act and Nigeria’s Electoral Democracy,” delivered at a public presentation of “A Collection of Essays: Readings on the Legislature,” authored by a policy expert, Prof Ladi Hamalai, on Wednesday, in Abuja.
He identified some “grey provisions” in the act that require immediate review to include Section 60(3) that borders on the electronic transmission of election results; Section 83(5), which restrains courts from entertaining any suit on the internal affairs of a political party and Section I38 (1), which excludes qualification as a ground for post-election challenge.
The professor of political science lauded the electoral law for mandating the electronic transmission of results, but expressed worry over the clause in the provision that makes the result sheet – Form EC8A – the primary collation document, where electronic transmission fails.
While acknowledging that the clause anticipates the need to fall back on Form EC8A if all efforts at electronic transmission fail, Jega warned it could be a recipe for election malpractice, noting that “given what we know about the Nigerian environment and the desperation of the ‘do-or-die’ politicians, there shouldn’t be such a vague provision, which would be used to truncate electronic transmission, in favour of manual transmission of results, which is easier to fraudulently manipulate and exploit.”
“Besides, there is an undue emphasis on reliance on data on the IReV portal for final determination of results in case of transmission failure. If this is so, there is a misunderstanding of the fact that IReV transmitted data is for public ‘viewing’ purposes only. The data to be relied upon in result declaration should be the backend result compilation database, which ideally is more secure, not publicly accessible, and less susceptible to fraudulent intrusion,” he added.
The former INEC chair described Section 83(5) as a sweeping generalisation that needs to be moderated, wondering how courts could be denied the power to entertain “internal affairs” of a political party that contradict constitutional provisions, such as those bordering on fundamental rights and the rule of law.
Recall that a former INEC Resident Electoral Commissioner, Mike Igini, had also raised the alarm over Section 63 of the act, warning that it could open the door to electoral manipulation ahead of the 2027 general elections.
Jega further questioned the constitutionality of excluding qualification as a ground for post-election matters, citing Section 131 of the 1999 Constitution, which recognises at least a school certificate or its equivalent as part of the requirements for any individual seeking to run for elective positions.
“Besides, it is a very good provision in the previous acts, which has been put to good use, and there does not seem to be any rational justification for removing it; unless, of course, if some certificate fraudsters and qualification racketeers would like to have an unrestricted field day,” he said.
He recommended urgent amendment to the 2026 Electoral Act “within the AU/ECOWAS protocols, which require all amendments to and reviews of the electoral legal framework to be completed at least six months to the general elections.”
As of today (Friday), the 2027 general election is six months and a week away, based on the revised INEC timetable, casting doubt on possible amendments. The presidential and National Assembly elections are slated for January 16, 2027, while the governorship and State Houses of Assembly elections will be held on February 6, 2027.
Prof Jega further identified other pertinent reforms to the electoral legal framework that should be addressed “at the earliest opportunity” after the 2027 elections. He said those reforms are persistent carry-overs from recommendations made by panels such as the Justice Muhammad Lawal Uwais Electoral Reform Committee.
The scholar stressed that to strengthen the independence of INEC, the power of appointment of the chairman and national commissioners should be taken away from the president, “to free the commission from the damaging negative perception of he who pays the piper calls the tune.”
He said INEC should be “unbundled” to enable it to focus on preparation and conduct of elections, while other agencies should be entrusted with the prosecution of electoral offenders, constituency delimitation, registration and regulation of political parties.
Jega recommended that beyond party registrations, there should be a stringent legal threshold political parties must cross before they could vie and field candidates for elective positions, especially offices of governor and president.
He maintained that the campaign finance limits – N10 billion for presidential candidates; N3bn for governorship candidates; N500 million for senatorial candidates; N250m for House of Representatives candidates; N100m for State House of Assembly candidates – are high and encourage monetisation of the electoral process. He called for a downward review and effective oversight by regulatory and law enforcement bodies to ensure compliance.
Jega said electoral reforms undoubtedly play a major role in shaping how citizens view the democratic process and whether they choose to participate in it. He urged that prolonged delay in reviewing and improving the electoral legal framework should be avoided, adding that reforms at every electoral cycle are commendable and should be sustained.
“But reform measures must be products of broad-based consultations, as nationalistic, patriotic and selfless endeavours by legislators, the government in power and key stakeholders, with a clear focus on adding remarkable value to electoral integrity and sustainable participatory democratic development,” he stated.
Jega said when reforms improve transparency, access and fairness, they strengthen public trust in democratic institutions and encourage greater voter turnout, civic engagement and participation as well as accountability of elected officials to the electorate.
“While the National Assembly and all stakeholders involved deserve commendation for ensuring that the 2022 Electoral Act was replaced by the 2026 Electoral Act, within one electoral cycle, some misplaced, whether unintended, are deliberately and selfishly introduced, have tended to undermine the corrective efficacy of the new law. These may need to be looked at and remedied as soon as possible,” he added.
In a country like Nigeria, Jega insisted that building trust through inclusive and well-implemented electoral reforms is critical to long-term, sustainable, democratic development, highlighting the major responsibility of courts in interpreting electoral provisions to safeguard the integrity of the electoral process.
“There are serious worrisome concerns emanating from the judicial quarters, in this regard, with willful acts by reckless judges/justices, acts of ‘judicial rascality’, which undermine not only electoral integrity and democratic development, but also integrity of the courts, and which the NJC (National Judicial Council) needs to swiftly nip in the bud.
“A good legal framework is a necessary condition for electoral integrity and desirable, sustainable democratic development. But it is not a sufficient condition. Other requirements include democratic character, mindset and disposition of the political parties and the politicians that populate them; enlightened and actively participating citizenry; and institutions that discharge their responsibilities effectively, efficiently and with integrity. It is a good combination of all these that puts a country in transition to democracy on the trajectory for stable, sustainable democratic development.
“Indeed, all hands need to be firmly on deck, to ensure a conducive environment for the preparation and conduct of the 2027 general elections with integrity; and improving the prospects of stable, sustainable democratic development in Nigeria,” he concluded.
News
13 Still Missing After 176 Kwara Kidnapp Rescue Operation
Thirteen residents of the 176 persons abducted during the February 3, 2026 attack by armed bandits on Woro and Nuku communities in Kaiama Local Government Area of Kwara State remain missing, despite the release of most of the captives after about six months in captivity.
The National Chairman of Kaiama Department Association, KDA, Yakubu Salihu, disclosed this on Thursday, saying only 163 of the 176 women and children abducted during the attack regained their freedom on Wednesday, leaving 13 others still unaccounted for.
“One hundred and seventy-six people were taken away, but only 163 were released. That leaves 13 people still missing. Where are the others?” Salihu asked.
Woro community came under attack on February 3 when armed kidnappers reportedly killed over 100 people and abducted 176 residents, mostly women and children.
Salihu disclosed that some of the women gave birth while in captivity, describing the development as a painful reminder of the traumatic ordeal the victims endured over the past six months.
He said the freed victims are currently in Niger State and are expected to return to Kwara on or before Saturday, where they will receive medical care and be supported through rehabilitation and resettlement programmes.
The KDA chairman renewed his call on the Federal Government to expedite the establishment of a Nigerian Army battalion in Kaiama, saying the shortage of security personnel has left communities in the area vulnerable to recurring attacks.
“The Federal Government is working towards establishing a Nigerian Army battalion in our community. As a community, we are ready to provide a suitable location and every support needed to ensure the military settles in quickly and begins operations,” he added.
According to him, the few security personnel deployed to the area are overstretched and unable to respond effectively to emergencies.
“If the Federal Government can expedite the establishment of the military base, we are ready to provide every necessary support to ensure its smooth take-off.
” Once the battalion becomes operational, security response will be faster, and we believe it will go a long way in preventing similar attacks,” Salihu stated.
He stressed that a permanent military presence is critical to restoring residents’ confidence and safeguarding communities against future attacks.
Salihu also appealed to governments at all levels to rehabilitate the deplorable road network in Kaiama Local Government Area, noting that poor roads continue to hamper security operations and hinder socio-economic development in the area.
News
PSC Hands Over 50,000 Recruits To Police For Training
The Police Service Commission (PSC) on Thursday handed over 50,000 newly recruited police constables to the Nigeria Police Force for training.
In a statement, the commission’s spokesperson, Torty Kalu, said the handover was presided over by Commissioner I, retired Justice Paul Galumje, in line with President Bola Tinubu’s directive and relevant statutory provisions.
Galumje thanked the President for supporting the recruitment exercise and formally presented the successful candidates to the police for training at designated police colleges and other approved institutions.
He also handed over the list of successful candidates to the police authorities in a flash drive.
Receiving the recruits on behalf of the Inspector-General of Police, DIG Isyaku Mohammed, who heads the Force Training and Development Department, commended the PSC for conducting what he described as a transparent recruitment process.
He assured that training would begin simultaneously across the country once funds for the exercise were released.
Also speaking, Director of the Police Service Department at the Ministry of Police Affairs, Ibrahim A. Muhammad, described the recruitment exercise as credible and transparent.
PSC Secretary, Onyemuche Nnamani, attributed the successful completion of the exercise to the collaboration of all stakeholders, saying it reflected effective teamwork.
President Tinubu had, on November 26, 2025, declared a national security emergency and approved the recruitment of 50,000 police officers to strengthen internal security.
The recruitment portal opened on December 15, 2025, and closed on February 8, 2026, after a two-week extension. The exercise was concluded about seven months later.
News
Reject State Police Bill, Police Welfare Group Tells Tinubu
The Movement for Improved Welfare for Nigeria Police Force (MIWNPF) has called on President Bola Tinubu to withhold assent to the controversial State Police Bill, alleging that the National Assembly passed the proposed legislation without public debate, stakeholder engagement, or input from leading civil society organisations that have long championed police reform and citizens’ security in Nigeria.
In a press statement dated August 4, 2026, and signed by its National Coordinator, Toyin Raheem Prince, the group described the process leading to the passage of the bill as “an affront to over 200 million Nigerians,” insisting that a law with far-reaching implications for Nigeria’s security architecture should not have been enacted without extensive public participation.
According to MIWNPF, the proposed legislation is expected to be transmitted to President Tinubu for presidential assent, but the organisation urged the President to reject the bill until Nigerians and relevant stakeholders are given an opportunity to debate its provisions.
The statement read, “The Movement for Improved Welfare for Nigeria Police Force (MIWNPF) is aware that a bill for the creation of state police is about to be transmitted to Mr President by the National Assembly.
“We are alarmed that this Bill was processed with no public debate, no stakeholder engagement, and no input from the very organisations that have spent years working on police reform and citizens’ security in Nigeria.”
The organisation said it was excluded from the legislative process alongside several prominent civil society groups actively involved in security sector reforms.
Among the organisations listed were the Rule of Law and Accountability Advocacy Centre (RULAC), Network on Police Reform in Nigeria (NOPRIN), CLEEN Foundation, Civil Liberties Organisation (CLO), Campaign for Constitutionalism and Human Rights (CCHR), Centre for Citizens with Disabilities (CCD), Centre for People’s Defence (CPD), Campaign for Democracy and Justice (CDJ), United Action for Democracy (UAD), Committee for the Defence of Human Rights (CDHR), Coalition Against Corruption and Bad Governance (CACOBAG), Democratic Socialist Movement (DSM), Nigeria Democratic Security Coalition (CNDSRC), and several others.
The group questioned why such organisations were not invited to make submissions before lawmakers.
“No public hearing was called. How can a law that will affect the security architecture of over 200 million Nigerians be passed in this manner?” the group asked.
MIWNPF argued that Nigeria is currently not prepared for the establishment of state police, warning that the proposed structure could easily be abused by state governors for political purposes.
It stated that, given Nigeria’s current political environment, state police could become instruments for intimidating opposition figures, manipulating elections, and settling political disputes.
“Risk of Political Misuse. In our current political climate, state police will become a tool in the hands of sitting governors to intimidate opponents, rig elections, and settle political scores. We have already seen the misuse of existing state-backed security outfits,” the organisation stated.
The group also warned that introducing another policing structure would worsen confusion within Nigeria’s already fragmented internal security framework.
It noted that various regional and state-backed security outfits already exist across the country, including the Western Nigeria Security Network (Amotekun) in the South-West, the Oodua People’s Congress (OPC), Hisbah religious police operating in Kano, Jigawa, Katsina, Zamfara and other northern states, the Ebubeagu Security Network in the South-East, as well as numerous community policing and vigilante groups.
According to the organisation, creating state police without first reforming and harmonising these existing structures would breed rivalry, duplication of responsibilities, and abuse of power.
The group also questioned the practical relevance of establishing state police when each state already has a Commissioner of Police appointed to oversee federal policing operations.
“Today, every state has a Commissioner of Police (CP) as the head of the federal police in the state. If we now create ‘State Police’ with a different head by another name, what changes? The structure remains the same, but accountability becomes weaker. Is that true federalism?” MIWNPF queried.
Drawing comparisons with other countries, MIWNPF argued that successful state policing systems operate within nations that possess stronger democratic institutions, independent judicial systems, autonomous local governments, and adequate funding.
The organisation cited the United States and Germany as examples of countries where decentralised policing works because institutional safeguards are firmly established.
Meanwhile, it pointed to Ghana, Rwanda and Kenya, where largely centralised policing systems have recorded significant reform successes.
According to the group, Nigeria’s policing crisis stems not from centralisation but from chronic underfunding, poor welfare, inadequate equipment, weak accountability mechanisms, and political interference.
Rather than creating state police, MIWNPF called for comprehensive reforms of the Nigeria Police Force, including increased funding, procurement of modern operational equipment such as patrol vehicles, forensic laboratories, body cameras and ICT infrastructure.
The group also demanded improved life assurance, health insurance, pensions, welfare packages, training programmes, psychological support for officers, merit-based postings, and an end to political interference in policing.
“Until these are fixed, creating state police is putting the cart before the horse,” the organisation said.
MIWNPF further criticised the manner in which the National Assembly handled the legislation, alleging that Nigerians no longer have confidence in the parliament led by Senate President Godswill Akpabio.
The group accused lawmakers of imposing the legislation without democratic consultation.
“The National Assembly cannot pass a Bill of this magnitude without hearing Nigerians. The Senate where ‘ayes have it’ even when the ‘nay’ was as loud as thunder, and the ‘aye’ as faint as a whisper in a crowded market. That is not democracy. That is imposition,” they said.
It added that true federalism should not be equated with the creation of separate state police forces, arguing instead that genuine federalism requires devolution of powers accompanied by responsibility, financial autonomy, and effective oversight mechanisms.
The organisation therefore made three demands.
It urged President Tinubu to withhold assent to the State Police Bill.
The organisation called on the National Assembly to organise a national public debate or town hall meeting on policing in Nigeria, with MIWNPF and all listed civil society organisations invited to participate.
MIWNPF urged the Federal Government to prioritise full implementation of the Nigeria Police Act 2020 by adequately funding and equipping the Nigeria Police Force, improving officers’ welfare, and carrying out comprehensive police reforms before considering any restructuring of the country’s policing system.
“Nigeria deserves security that protects the people, not security that protects politicians,” they added.
-
Health & Wellness12 months agoPresident Tinubu Directs Cut in Dialysis Cost from ₦50,000 to ₦12,000
-
News1 year agoPICTURE: In Lagos Couple Sentenced to 22½ Years for Cannabis Trafficking
-
Trending News12 months agoNELFUND Disburses ₦86bn To 449,000 Beneficiaries
-
Business4 months agoDangote Refinery Reduces Petrol Gantry Price To ₦1,200 Per Litre
-
International News4 months agoIndian Police Arrest Nigerian Over ₦290m Drug Haul
-
Business4 months agoAfter Plea Bargain, Court Discharges Stella Oduah of ₦2.5bn Fraud
-
Business2 years agoHeritage Bank Customers’ Path to Securing ₦5m Insured Funds: A Step-By-Step Guide by NDIC”
-
Business2 years ago
Dangote; We Did Not Fix ₦600/Litre Petrol Price
