News
Court Snubs FG In Case Against Dasuki
The Federal High Court sitting in Abuja, on Tuesday, declined to admit in evidence a set of exhibits the Federal Government sought to tender against a former National Security Adviser (NSA), Col. Sambo Dasuki (rtd).
Dasuki, who served as the NSA under former President Goodluck Jonathan, is answering to an amended seven-count charge bordering on money laundering and his alleged possession of illegal firearms.
The court, in a ruling that was delivered by Justice Peter Lifu, refused the evidence on the premise that the exhibits were rejected when they were previously tendered.
According to Justice Lifu, since the exhibits were rejected and marked as such, they could no longer be readmitted in the trial, as doing so would amount to judicial rascality.
Moreover, he held that FG, by its request, sought to force a trial court to sit on appeal over its own ruling.
“I recall that on July 10, 2025, I delivered a considered ruling, rejecting the same sets of exhibits due to improper foundation for their admission and lack of relevance to the charge. That ruling still subsists, and I am bound by it.
“Any attempt to toe the paths of going against the same ruling will definitely amount to judicial rascality and pettiness. Common sense does not even support granting this kind of request. “This court rejects the invitation, and the request is hereby rejected,” Justice Lifu held.
FG had in the charge pending before the Federal High Court in Abuja alleged that the erstwhile NSA was on July 17, 2015, at his house situated at No. 13, John Khadiya Street, Asokoro, Abuja, found to be in possession of various ranges of firearms without the requisite licence, an offence punishable under section 27 (1)(a) of the Firearms Act Cap F28 LFN 2004.
He was accused of retaining the sums of $40,000, N5 million and another $20,000 in the same house and on the same date, contrary to section 15 (2)(d) of the Money Laundering Prohibition Act 2011.
Besides, FG alleged that the defendant had, on July 16, 2015, at his residence at Sultan Abubakar Road and Sabon Birni Road, Sokoto State, retained another $150,000 and N37.6m, being part of the proceeds of an unlawful act, contrary to Section 15 (3) of the Money Laundering Act 2011.
It listed the alleged illegal arms it found at Dasuki’s residence in Abuja as five Tavor assault rifles, 1 Macro Uzi with serial no. 60244 (rifle), 20 magazines (ammunition), 1 packet of MOD (Ministry of Defence) APG calibre gun, Luger no. 033375 (gun), a small magazine containing 16 rounds of ammunition, and a bigger magazine containing live rounds of ammunition.
FG had, through its team of lawyers led by Mr Oladipupo Okpeseyi, SAN, sought permission of the court to tender what it described as vital proof of evidence in the trial.
Okpeseyi, SAN, further urged the court to move its sitting to the headquarters of the Department of State Services (DSS) in Abuja for the purpose of inspecting some of the evidence, which included a vehicle he said was recovered from the defendant when a search warrant was executed at his house in 2015.
The prosecution counsel stressed that the said vehicle, which he wants the court to admit in evidence, has been parked at the premises of the DSS for the past 10 years.
He told the court that the set of evidence sought to be tendered against the defendant were all recovered from Dasuki’s home and listed on the search warrant as items 18 to 28.
However, the application was vehemently opposed by Dasuki’s lawyer, Mr A. A. Usman, who drew the attention of the trial judge to the fact that the said proof of evidence was earlier tendered but refused and marked as rejected by the court.
Usman contended that since the exhibits had already been rejected by the trial court, they could not be tendered again.
He maintained that the only option open to the prosecution was to challenge the ruling at the Court of Appeal.
The defence lawyer read a portion of the ruling where the court based its decision for rejecting the evidence on the ground that it failed the test of admissibility.
He, therefore, prayed the court to reject the fresh bid to tender the exhibits again, insisting the application was baseless, ill-conceived, misplaced, unwarranted and a ploy to draw the hand of the clock backward.
Dasuki, who had since pleaded not guilty to allegations against him, is equally facing two separate money laundering charges that the administration of the late former President Muhammadu Buhari filed against him before the High Court of the Federal Capital Territory, FCT.
International News
Transfer: Real Madrid , Cucurella Reach Verbal Agreement
Chelsea reliable defender, Marc Cucurella may join Spanish giant, Real Madrid before the end of the current transfer window.if information from transfer journalist, Fabrizio Romano are anything to go by.
Romano In a latest transfer update, said Real Madrid has reached verbal agreement to sign Marc Cucurella from Chelsea.
“Verbal agreement in place between all parties, player too — he’s the left back wanted by Mourinho” the update read.
News
Hakimi, Vinicius Barred From Speaking Spanish At World Cup
FIFA has come under scrutiny after several high-profile players, including Achraf Hakimi and Vinicius Junior, were discouraged from speaking Spanish during media engagements at the 2026 FIFA World Cup in the United States.
The issue first surfaced ahead of Morocco’s Group C clash with Brazil when a Spanish-speaking journalist attempted to question Morocco captain Achraf Hakimi in Spanish.
Despite Hakimi, who grew up in Madrid and speaks the language fluently, indicating he was comfortable answering in Spanish, event officials reportedly insisted that questions be asked in English.
Hakimi attempted to reassure organizers that language would not be a barrier, but officials maintained that no Spanish translator was available for the session. A compromise was eventually reached, with the reporter asking the question in Spanish while Hakimi responded in English.
The controversy intensified during Brazil’s media session when Vinicius Junior was also interrupted while responding to a question in Spanish.
The Real Madrid forward, who is more comfortable speaking Portuguese or Spanish than English, was reportedly asked by organizers to switch languages.
Rather than continue in Spanish, Vinicius opted to answer in Portuguese before turning his attention back to Brazil’s World Cup preparations.
The incidents sparked widespread debate among journalists and fans, many of whom questioned why Spanish—a language spoken by millions across North America—was effectively restricted at a tournament being hosted largely in the United States.
According to Spanish media outlet El País, FIFA only provides Spanish-language translation services at World Cup press conferences involving Spanish-speaking nations such as Spain, Mexico, Argentina, Uruguay, Colombia, Ecuador, and Paraguay.
For all other teams, questions and answers are expected to be conducted either in English or the official language of the participating country.
The policy has generated criticism online, with many supporters arguing that multilingual communication should be encouraged at a global event like the World Cup.
The backlash was particularly strong in Vinicius’ case, as the Brazilian forward appeared visibly uncomfortable being asked to communicate in English.
The controversy overshadowed what was otherwise a highly anticipated encounter between Brazil and Morocco, which ended in a 1-1 draw.
With the issue now drawing international attention, FIFA may face increasing calls to review its media language guidelines as the tournament progresses.
News
It’s Illegal’…Falana’s Bombshell Indicts Govs, FG.
Human rights advocate, Femi Falana, has warned federal and state governments against negotiating with and rewarding terrorists.
According to Falana, the practice is illegal.
He stated this while delivering the keynote address at the Amnesty International Second Annual General Meeting in Abuja on June 13, 2026.
Falana claimed it is public knowledge officials of the Federal Government and some State Governments have been holding meetings and negotiating with terrorists and bandits, which has led to thousands of ‘repentant’ criminals being forgiven and given cash gifts of undisclosed sums of money.
Asserting that the “satanic Boko Haram sect and similar bodies have been proscribed” under the Terrorism (Prevention and Prohibition) Act, Falana insisted that “their members and allies shall be prosecuted and not pampered and forgiven by the Nigerian State.”
Highlighting the legal consequences, he quoted Section 22 of the Act, stating: “A person who knowingly—(a) arranges, manages, assists in arranging or managing, participates in a meeting or an activity, which in his knowledge is concerned or connected with an act of terrorism or terrorist group, (b) collects, or provides logistics, equipment, information, articles or facilities for a meeting or an activity, which in his knowledge is concerned or connected with an act of terrorism or terrorist group, or (c) attends a meeting, which in his knowledge is to support a proscribed entity or to further the objectives of a proscribed entity, commits an offence, and is liable on conviction to imprisonment for a term of at least 20 years.”
-
Health & Wellness10 months agoPresident Tinubu Directs Cut in Dialysis Cost from ₦50,000 to ₦12,000
-
News10 months agoPICTURE: In Lagos Couple Sentenced to 22½ Years for Cannabis Trafficking
-
Business3 months agoDangote Refinery Reduces Petrol Gantry Price To ₦1,200 Per Litre
-
Trending News10 months agoNELFUND Disburses ₦86bn To 449,000 Beneficiaries
-
International News2 months agoIndian Police Arrest Nigerian Over ₦290m Drug Haul
-
Business3 months agoAfter Plea Bargain, Court Discharges Stella Oduah of ₦2.5bn Fraud
-
Business2 years agoHeritage Bank Customers’ Path to Securing ₦5m Insured Funds: A Step-By-Step Guide by NDIC”
-
Business2 years ago
Dangote; We Did Not Fix ₦600/Litre Petrol Price
