Many residents of the Abuja Municipal Area Council (AMAC) have rejected the enforcement of television and radio sets tax by the area council authorities.
They described it as untimely, accusing the government of not being sensitive to the plight of the masses.
According to report, residents described the council’s action as inhuman amid the severe economic hardship in the country.
A demand notice from the area council was recently sent to some residents, requesting them to pay for the usage of these and other items in their houses and business premises
“Many residents shared the notice on their social media platforms, calling for a reversal of the policy” the report said.
The controversy stems from the recently assented AMAC Radio and Television Licence By-Law (No. 19) of 2024.
The invoice, or notice of demand, sent to residents requests full payment within 21 days.
According to the notice, failure to comply is a punishable offence that could lead to arraignment at the magistrate’s court and the possible sealing off of the affected premises.
The new by-law mandates an annual license fee for anyone who owns or controls a radio, television, or “other items of the same or similar kind.”
The annual fees are categorised as follows: large banks and multinationals (Category B) are to pay N1,000,000 annually, medium-sized businesses (Supermarkets, hotels, and telecom companies – Category C) are to pay between N50,000 and N200,000 and residents (Duplexes, flats, bungalows, and self-contained apartments – Category D), who are to pay between N3,500 and N20,000 per dwelling.
A Cross-section of AMAC residents have demanded the stoppage of the tax policy, labelling it ill-timed.
Mr John Achungu, a business owner at the Central Business District, said he was shocked when the council’s revenue officers delivered the notice.
“Honestly, this is surprising! How can you ask me to pay for the television I’m using in my office or waiting room? What service are you rendering in that regard? Providing the signal for the TV or the electricity we are using to power it? I can’t really understand,” he lamented.
Mrs Zainab Muhammad, a food vendor in Wuse District, said her business was classified in Category C and she was asked to pay the required amount within 21 days or risk her business being sealed off.
“The same AMAC will bring the tenement rate, bring this, bring that; how many taxes are they going to collect from us? Honestly, this administration has been something else from the national down to the local,” she complained.
For Ifeanyi James, the new tax is targeted at further discomforting residents amid the economic crisis they are passing through. “They expect us to pay another tax to watch our stations even after we have paid service providers. They want us to even pay for listening to the radio. What is the difference between this and the radio license during the olden days?” he asked.
Samson Isah, a community leader in Jabi, described the tax policy as not only ridiculous but inhuman to many residents who are struggling to live.
“When one of my tenants told me about the demand from the AMAC, I did not believe her until the following day when she came with the demand notice from the area council,” he said.
The report claimed some other residents, called for an immediate review and possible suspension.
Toyin Ajayi, a public affairs analyst, demanded a public campaign to explain the necessity of the tax and what the generated revenue will be used for, rather than just issuing demand notices with threats.
He also stressed the need for a clear explanation of what constitutes “electronic devices” to prevent extortion and harassment by enforcement officers.
Meanwhile, the Abuja Municipal Area Council (AMAC) has justified the tax, saying it is constitutional and not new, as is been assumed in some quarters, the report added.
