Connect with us

International News

FULL LIST: NJC Sends 10 Judges On Compulsory Retirement, Recommends 21 For Appointment

Published

on

Spread the love

The National Judicial Council (NJC) at its 109th Meeting presided over by the Honourable, the Chief Justice of Nigeria, Hon. Justice Kudirat M. O. Kekere-Ekun, GCON, held on 25 June 2025 has recommended two Hon. Judges for appointment as Heads of Court for Ekiti and Yobe States, respectively.

 

The Heads of Court are:

Hon. Justice Adekanye Lekan Ogunmoye, Chief Judge, Ekiti State; and Hon. Kadi Abba Mammadi as Grand Kadi, Yobe State.

Similarly, Council has also recommended Mainasara Ibrahim Kogo Umar, Esq. to the President of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, Bola Ahmed Tinubu, GCFR, for appointment as Chairman, Code of Conduct Tribunal.

The recommendations followed a careful consideration of various public complaints made against shortlisted candidates for the various positions and a rigorous interview by an 8- Member Interview Committee of the Council in line with the 2023 Revised NJC Guidelines and Procedural Appointment of Judicial Officers.

The remaining successful recommended for appointment as Judges for different Jurisdictions are as follows:

TWO HIGH COURT JUDGES FOR CROSS RIVER STATE
i) Edu, Glory Bassey
i) Irem, Melody Bassey

THREE HIGH COURT JUDGES FOR OGUN STATE
Adebayo Julius Adewole, Adejumoke Oluwatoyin Adebo, Oluyemisi Olukemi

THREE HIGH COURT JUDGES FOR ZAMFARA STATE i) Garba, Sirajo Aliyu
1) Bashir, Rabi
iii) Abdullahi, Nasiru

THREE KADIS FOR SHARIA COURT OF APPEAL, ZAMFARA STATE
Ibrahim, Jibril
Muhammed, Sanusi Magami
Shaa’ ban Mansur

ONE KADI FOR SHARIA COURT OF APPEAL, PLATEAU STATE

i) Badamasi, Kabir Adam

ONE JUDGE FOR CUSTOMARY COURT OF APPEAL, EBONYI STATE
i) Ogodo, Lynda Nneka

FOUR HIGH COURT JUDGES FOR KATSINA STATE
i) Dikko, Fadila Muhammad
ii) Abdulrahman, Shamsudden Yammama
iii) Abdullahi, Maryham Umaru
iv) Mohammed, Abubakar Dikko

It would be recalled that the Council had at its 108th Meeting held on 29 and 30 April 2025, approved a new policy to publish the names of candidates for consideration for appointment as Judicial Officers and invited public input.

A flurry of 86 public comments and complaints were received by the Council and 73 of them were favourable representing 85%, while 13 were adverse representing 15%.

However, out of the Thirteen (13) complaints, Five (5) had no accompanying verifying affidavits in breach of the publication guidelines and were not considered.

In view of the Council’s resolution, at its 27h Emergency Meeting held on 3 February 2025, relating to the appointment of the Chief Judge, Ekiti State, Council did not consider the Three (3) complaints relating thereto.

Five (5) complaints were considered against the appointment relating to the High Courts of Plateau and Kano States and the Sharia Courts of Appeal of Zamfara and Katsina States.

Flowing from this, Council dismissed Four (4) of the complaints, but found merit in one and dropped the affected candidate.

Meanwhile, the Council has approved the voluntary retirement of the following Judicial Officers:
i) Hon. Justice Babatunde Ademola Bakre of the Ogun State High Court.
ii) Hon. Justice H. O. Ajayi of the Kwara State High Court.

In the meantime, the Council has recommended compulsory retirement of ten Judges of Imo State Judiciary.

Nine (9) of the affected Judges of the Imo State Judiciary were found to have altered their dates of birth in their official records

in order to confer on themselves the undue advantage of staying longer in service while the other Judicial Officer, Hon. Justice .T N. Nzeukwu was found to have made himself available to be sworn in as acting Chief Judge of Imo State High Court knowing fully well that he was number four in the hierarchy of Judges of the Imo State Judiciary and contrary to Section 271.

(4) of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, as amended.

The nine Judges found to have falsified their records, comprising five (5) High Court Judges and four Judges of the
Customary Court of Appeal, Imo State are:
1. Hon Justice M. E. Nwagboso (High Court) 2. Hon Justice B. C. Theka (High Court)
3. Hon Justice K. A. Leaweanya (High Court)
.4 Hon Justice Okereke Chinyere Ngozi (High Court)
5. Hon Justice Innocent Chidi Ibeawuchi (High Court)
6. Hon Justice Tennyson Nze (Customary Court of Appeal)
7. Hon Justice Ofoha Uchenna (Customary Court of Appeal) 8. Hon Justice Everyman Eleanya (Customary Court of
Appeal)
9. Hon Justice Rosemond Ibe (Customary Court of Appeal)

Hon. Justice .T N. Nzeukwu was sanctioned for making himself available to be sworn into office as acting Chief Judge of Imo State.

The President of the Customary Court of Appeal, Imo State, Hon Justice V. U. Okorie who chaired the Commission that nominated Hon. Justice Nzeukwu as acting Chief Judge was however absolved, having dissented on record against the recommendation to appoint Hon. Justice T. N. Nzeukwu as acting Chief Judge.
Council however reiterated its earlier direction to the Imo State Governor, Senator Hope Uzodinma to swear in the most Senior Judge of the State as the acting Chief Judge.

Council took the decision after consideration of the reports of its Investigation Committee on allegations of age falsification against eighteen (18) Judges of the Imo state judiciary on the one hand and the queries issued to Hon. Justices V. U. Okorie and T. N. Nzeukwu.

The Council however dismissed, for want of merit, similar allegations against three Judges of the State High Court whose dates of birth were found to bear no discrepancy.

Six High Court Judges of the State, whose dates of birth either had discrepancies but with acceptable explanations or with discrepancies arising from genuine correction of their dates of birth to their disadvantage, were also exonerated.

The Judges whose dates of birth were found to bear no discrepancy are:
.1 Hon Justice .I O. Agugua (High Court)
2. Hon Justice C. A. Ononeze-Madu (High Court) 3. Hon Justice L. C. Azuama (High Court)

The two Judges given a clean bill of health owing to provision
of acceptable explanation for discrepancies in their dates of birth are:
1. Hon Justice Vincent I. Onyeka (High Court)
2. Hon Justice Vivian O. B. Ekezie (High Court)
Council directed that Hon. Justice Onyeka and Hon. Justice Ekezie must maintain the date of birth supplied by the Council of Legal Education in their official records.
Four other Judges absolved on account that they genuinely corrected their dates of birth to their disadvantage are:
.1 Hon Justice P. U. Nodum (High Court)
.2 Hon. Justice Alma Ngozi Eluwa (High Court)
.3 Hon. Justice Matthew Chinedu Ijezie (High Court) 4. Hon Justice Ononogbo Chidi Linus (High Court)
The Council has also reiterated its earlier direction to the
Governor of Imo State, Senator Hope Uzodinma, to appoint the most Senior Judicial Officer as the acting Chief Judge of the Imo State High Court.

Council, in further deliberation, barred a Judge of the National Industrial Court, Hon. Justice Isaac J. Essien, from being considered for promotion to a Higher Court for three years due to misconduct.

Council found that Hon. Justice Essien wrongly ordered the confiscation of over N1 billion belonging to the Nasarawa State Government and its Local Government Councils, despite being aware that there was a pending appeal and a pending application for stay of execution.

Council also noted that he refused to step aside from the case after the Nasarawa State Government raised concerns about possible bias.

Hon. Justice Essien was a former staff member of the State University, which owed him gratuity, and he had earlier demanded payment using the official letterhead of the Court – a clear breach of Code of Conduct for Judicial Officers.

Council further criticized him for personally visiting the Court of Appeal registry to confirm if an appeal had been filed in the case — an action considered highly inappropriate for a Judge.

His Lordship was found to have violated several rules in the Revised Code of Conduct for Judicial Officers and was reprimanded and barred from elevation to a higher judicial office for a period of (3) three years.

Council also considered the reports of its Preliminary Complaints Assessment Committees, which contained a total number of 30 petitions against various Judicial Officers. Four (4) Committees were empanelled for further investigation, four

(4) Judges were cautioned, while 2 petitions were dismissed for lacking in merit.

Council cautioned Hon. Justice Rahman A. Oshodi, over misuse of judicial discretion in Suit No. ID/232/53C/23.
Hon. Justice Daniel Okungbowa, Chief Judge Edo State was also cautioned over abuse of his judicial discretion in Suit No.
B1/555/2020 and was advised to exercise his discretion judicially and judiciously in future.

Council issued a final warning to Hon. Justice G. B. Okolosi of the Delta State High Court for continued flouting Section 294 (1) of the 1999 Constitution and Hon. Justice Sa’adatu .I Mark, Federal High Court received caution for delivering judgment after constitutional 90 days.

Petition against Chief Judge, Benue State, Hon. Justice M. A. Ikpambese:

Council deliberated on the report of the investigation Committee in respect of three petitions by Attorney-General and Commissioner for Justice, Fidelis Bemsen Mnyim, Guana Benjamin Joseph, Esq., and Terhemen Ngbea against Hon. Justice M. A. Ikpambese and absolved the Chief Judge from any judicial wrong doings, the petitions having ben found ot be lacking in merit.

It noted that all the petitions presented against him were with sole aim to remove him from his position.

Council was particularly concerned about the role of the Attorney-General of the State, Fidelis Bemsen Mnyim, Esq., ni the scheme to remove the Chief Judge and resolved to report him to the Legal Practitioners’ Disciplinary Committee (LPDC) for necessary action.

Council dismissed petitions against four other Judges:

1. Hon. Justice A. M. Liman of the Federal High Court, Kano Division (Petition by Abdullahi Baffa Bichi)

2. Hon. Justice S. A. Amobeda (Petition by Abdullahi Baffa Bichi)

3 Hon. Justice Muhammad Auwal Haruna (Petition by Abdulrazaq Banaru Abubakar)

4. Hon. Justice Binta Fatima Murtala Nyako (Petition by Kabiru S. Chafe)

The joint petition against Hon. Justices A. M. Liman and S. A. Amobeda, and the petition against Hon. Justice Muhammad Auwal Haruna were withdrawn and accordingly
dismissed.

Hon. Justice Binta Fatima Murtala Nyako was exonerated as the Council found no merit in the petition accusing her of delaying judgment and issuing an order on a property while the case was ongoing.

Further action was suspended in respect of petitions against Hon. Justice A. M. Liman by Kenneth Okere (in a different case) and Hon. Justice Yusuf Halilu of the FCT High Court for being sub judice.

The Council, however blacklisted one Peter N. Ekemezie a serial petitioner from presenting further petitions before it.

 

Kemi Babalola
Ogedengbe Deputy Director (Information)

International News

Transfer: Real Madrid , Cucurella Reach Verbal Agreement 

Published

on

Spread the love

 

Chelsea reliable defender, Marc Cucurella may join Spanish giant, Real Madrid before the end of the current transfer window.if information from transfer journalist, Fabrizio Romano are anything to go by.

 

Romano In a latest transfer update, said Real Madrid has reached verbal agreement to sign Marc Cucurella from Chelsea.

“Verbal agreement in place between all parties, player too — he’s the left back wanted by Mourinho” the update read.

Continue Reading

International News

Ancelotti: Pressure Affected Brazil Against Morocco 

Published

on

Spread the love

 

Carlo Ancelotti felt Brazil were “anxious” in their World Cup opener against Morocco, as he suggested the pressure got to his players.

 

Brazil were largely underwhelming at New York New Jersey Stadium, as they opened their Group C campaign with a 1-1 draw.

World Cup 2022 semi-finalists Morocco made a fine start, which was capped off when Ismael Saibari charged through in the 21st minute and lofted a cute finish over Alisson.

With the unfit Neymar watching on from the bench, Vinicius Junior slammed home a brilliant equaliser 11 minutes later, but Brazil could not find a way through Morocco’s defence for a second time.

In fact, Brazil relied on a sharp double save from Alisson late on to preserve a point, and Ancelotti knows there is plenty of scope for improvement.

“I think it was a tough match, especially in the first half,” Ancelotti said, as reported by ESPN

“Maybe the team was a bit anxious, and the nerves were all over the place. The second half was better, but it was still tough, and I’m sure we’ll get better.

“I think that’s something we’ll have to look into.

“There’s a lot of pressure, so it’s natural. Little by little, we’ll improve in that sense.”

Brazil are, at least, unbeaten in their opening match in the last 21 World Cups dating back to 1938 (W17 D4).

It is the longest such streak in the history of the World Cup, more than twice as long as any other (Germany, Netherlands – nine straight).

“We have to reassess what we did,” Ancelotti added.

“In the first half, we were very unbalanced. We did a bit better in the second half. The result isn’t bad. You don’t win the World Cup in your first match.

“I’m not disappointed, but I’m not satisfied, either. We need to work, but that’s normal. Morocco played well. They’re a solid team, very well organised. It was a difficult game.

“For many different reasons, a debut in the World Cup might not end up as expected. The goal is to qualify, move on to the next round and improve over time.”

With uncertainty over how much Neymar will be able to contribute at this tournament, Brazil need Vinicius to step up, and the Real Madrid forward demonstrated his quality with a wonderful run and finish to restore parity.

It marked Vinicius’ 10th goal for Brazil, with three of those coming on American soil.

“We started on a really bad note,” Vinicius said. “For certain, we got to hold on to the ball. We have to move better.”

Continue Reading

International News

Revealed: Why Yamal Lost Spain’s No.10 Shirt To Olmo At The Mundia

Published

on

Spread the love

 

According to The Athletic, Yamal will not wear the No. 10 jersey for Spain; it will belong to teammate Olmo.

 

Pelé, Diego Maradona, Zinedine Zidane, Messi, and Roberto Baggio have all delivered superstar-level performances at the FIFA World Cup.

What do they have in common? They all wore the No. 10 jersey at the time.

Historically, this number typically belongs to the most creative player on the team, usually an attacking midfielder, and sometimes even a forward. It is also part of a player’s personal brand, an honor reserved for a special type of player.

Spain is one of the favorites to win this summer’s North American tournament, and there is no bigger name in the squad than Yamal. But he will not wear the No. 10 for Spain; instead, he will wear No. 19, the same number he wore in the summer of 2024 when he helped Spain win the European Championship in Germany.

So, why can’t the 18-year-old, who wears this legendary number at Barcelona—a number most easily associated with the club’s all-time leading goal scorer and appearance record holder Messi—enjoy the same treatment with the Spanish national team?

Spain’s No. 10 this summer will be Olmo, who is also one of Yamal’s teammates at Barcelona.

Olmo wears No. 20 at Barcelona, but for the national team, a simple factor puts him ahead of the young player when deciding numbers: seniority.

Spain’s system for assigning squad numbers dictates that the player with the most national team appearances gets priority in choosing from available numbers.

Yamal has made 25 appearances for the national team since his debut in 2023; Olmo has 50 national team appearances and was already wearing the No. 10 before Yamal joined the Spanish squad.

Yamal has proven capable of handling the challenge of wearing the No. 10 at Barcelona. When Messi left the club in a painful manner in the summer of 2021, it left Barcelona with several issues to resolve, one of which was who would inherit the No. 10 and bear the pressure of the legacy left by the Argentinian.

Ansu Fati, one of the brightest talents to emerge from Barcelona’s La Masia academy in recent years, did not succeed. After Messi’s departure, he inherited the No. 10 but suffered multiple injuries and could not meet expectations.

Barcelona sources believe that giving the number to Fati was a mistake because it placed too much pressure on the young player. Like all quoted sources in this article, they requested anonymity to protect their relationships.

But Yamal’s situation is different. He took over Fati’s No. 10 last summer and hasn’t looked back since. Last season, he achieved his career-best statistics, scoring 24 goals and providing 17 assists in 45 games.

Not wearing the Spanish No. 10 has also not affected Yamal’s progress with the national team.

This is not seen as a problem, but rather as part of the young player’s development. Everyone in the Spanish squad understands the rules, and sources close to Yamal and the team insist that Yamal holds no resentment towards Olmo.

It can also be argued that, besides international recognition, there are commercial factors for jersey numbers that should not be overlooked. Giving Yamal the No. 10 would certainly boost sales of the Spanish team’s jerseys and bring a more significant commercial impact from the star player.

However, respect among teammates, especially for more senior players, is a key tenet for Spain’s coach Luis de la Fuente and the foundation of the culture he is building for this Spanish team.

No individual is important enough to be above this team spirit, not even Yamal. The young player is considered the most important attacking player for Spain and is highly respected in the locker room, but breaking the seniority policy to take a teammate’s number is simply not allowed in this team.

Gavi should also be mentioned. The 21-year-old player has primarily played as a central midfielder for Barcelona this season, even playing as a defensive midfielder, but he will wear No. 9 for Spain, a number more commonly associated with central forwards.

There’s a story behind this too. When Gavi made his Spain debut in 2021, No. 9 was the last available number when he chose.

That year, he made his debut in the Nations League semi-final win against Italy, with an impressive performance, and Gavi has stuck with that number ever since. Whenever the national team’s No. 9 is available, he always chooses it.

Spain’s starting forward Oyarzabal actually began his career as a winger, but he has always chosen No. 21 and decided to keep this number throughout his national team career.

Another forward included in Luis de la Fuente’s FIFA World Cup squad, Celta player Borja Iglesias, has 8 national team appearances, fewer than Gavi’s 30, so he cannot get the No. 9.

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2026 TheColumn NG