Operatives of the Enugu Zonal Directorate of the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission, EFCC have commenced investigations into the activities of one Ralph Chinazum Ajah, Managing Director, Paramount Energy Limited for an alleged case of obtaining by false pretence and stealing to the tune of N72, 300, 000. 00 (Seventy two million, Three Hundred Thousand Naira).

A petitioner alleged that he sent the said sum to Ajah for the supply of petroleum products to some of his branches. The said money was paid in six tranches between April 11, 2022 and May 24, 2022. “After he collected the money, he kept promising to supply the products as agreed but failed to do so which then prompted us to do preliminary investigations and we discovered that Chinazumah Ajah and his company do not have the capacity to supply the products and he deliberately defrauded us of our business capital”, the petitioner said.

However, investigations revealed that the suspect used the account of his company, Paramount Energy Limited, to receive the said sum after which he transferred the money into his account for personal use.

The suspect will be charged to court as soon as investigations are concluded.

A women right group, ‘The Women Advocates’ (TWA) has petitioned the First Lady, Sen. Oluremi Tinubu over male domination of elective and appointive positions in Oshodi/Isolo Federal Constituency II ahead of the forthcoming primaries of the All Progressive Congress (APC) in Lagos State.

In a petition addressed to the wife of the president, the group sought the intervention of the First Lady over what it described as total neglect of the women folks in aspiring for the House of Representatives seat from the constituency.

The group in the petition which was jointly signed by its coordinator, Adejoke Olaogun and Secretary Helen Nwachukwu respectively noted with dismay that since the advent of the second republic in 1999, no female politician has been given the opportunity to represent the constituency at the House of Representatives.

The group listed six male politicians who have represented the constituency to include Gbolahan Okuneye, Jaiyeola Ajatta, Hakeem Muniru, Tony Nwulu, Ganiu Johnson and now currently Okey Joe Onuakalusi.

The Women Advocates said the total domination of elective and appointive positions by male politicians in the constituency negates the gender equality and all-inclusive principle of President Bola Ahmed Tinubu who recently supported constitutional amendment initiated by the National Assembly for increased women’s participation in governance by advocating for at least 35% affirmative action in elective and appointive positions.

The initiative of the National Assembly also gained the affirmation of the ruling party, All Progressive Congress APC (APC) which officially pushed for reduced political hostility, greater inclusion in leadership and also introduced initiatives like ‘774 Explore’ for grassroot mobilization, aiming to boost female representation ahead of the 2027 elections.

“For this obvious gender imbalance, we are constrained to seek your intervention in addressing this anomaly. Being gender-friendly and a strong advocate of women’s inclusion in governance, we are convinced your timely intervention would restore hope of leadership opportunities for the women folks who are expectedly to mobilize extensively for the re-election bid of the president in 2027,” the petition read in part.

It continued: “To this end, we earnestly solicit consideration of female aspirants as APC candidates in a fair and equitable manner ahead of the forthcoming party primaries across the 25 LGAs and 37 LCDAs in Lagos particularly in Oshodi/Isolo Federal Constituency II where we lost the last House of Representatives election to the Labour Party (LP).”

The group specifically appealed for support for Angela Yinka Akintunde as a candidate for the House of Representatives seat in Oshodi-Isolo Federal Constituency II, describing her candidacy as a step toward bridging the gender gap in elective offices.

Women Advocates further urged party leaders and stakeholders to embrace inclusivity and fairness in the forthcoming primaries, emphasizing that equitable representation would enhance political development and social progress in the state

Since the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) suspended recognition of all leadership factions in the African Democratic Congress (ADC) following a ruling by the Court of Appeal and ongoing litigation over the party’s leadership, the polity has been on edge. That is understandable given the status of the party as an emerging opposition platform.

In a statement by its spokesperson, Mohammed Haruna, the electoral commission hinged its decision on an order by the Court of Appeal. In obedience to the court order, the commission decided to stop engaging with any of the two warring factions until there is a substantive court judgement after it received conflicting letters demanding recognition from both sides. Pointedly, the judgement did not favour the faction led by David Mark, prompting INEC to decline recognition of his chairmanship.

The point, then, is that the court ruling of the Appeal Court undermines the legitimacy of David Mark’s leadership, and INEC’s position reinforces the legal effect of the judgement, effectively limiting his authority in dealing with the electoral body. To say that the decision places the party in a contested leadership situation, pending possible appeals or internal resolution, is to put it very mildly.

Not just ahead of the 2027 general election but in politics generally, it is a no-brainer that internal divisions impair coordinated campaign efforts across states. If the ADC refuses to put its house in order, it risks disintegration and utter irrelevance, both in the build up to the election and thereafter.

Disputes over legitimate party leadership will inevitably lead to conflicting candidate lists, risking disqualification or exclusion from ballots. Besides, the party’s ability to form alliances or coalitions ahead of elections will be significantly diminished. If the party continues to present a picture of instability, voters will simply look the other way.

The question they would be asking themselves is how a party that cannot properly organise, harmonise and manage its internal issues can hope to govern Nigeria effectively. The inescapable conclusion, given ADC’s antics so far, is that it is not prepared for the 2027 polls but is only interested in bickering and wrangling, intent on leading Nigerians, particularly undecided or swing voters, down a slippery slope.

If unresolved before key electoral deadlines, the ADC risks reduced participation or irrelevance in the forthcoming elections. The party is likely to experience operational disruptions unless a legally recognized leadership emerges quickly. Its performance may decline significantly in comparison to more stable parties, unless the crisis is resolved and unity restored.

The best-Case Scenario would be for swift judicial clarification or internal reconciliation restores leadership legitimacy and stabilizes party operations, while the worst-case scenario would be prolonged litigation and factional conflict result in parallel structures, disqualification risks, and electoral underperformance.

The court ruling and INEC’s response represent a critical inflection point for the African Democratic Congress. Without rapid resolution, the party faces a high-risk trajectory that could significantly undermine its competitiveness in the forthcoming elections.

The genesis of the current crisis plaguing the party is the decision by a member of the National Working Committee (NWC) of the party to drag its factional chairman, Senator David Mark to the Federal High Court, seeking an ex parte order. The judge didn’t grant it outright. Instead, he asked Mark to come and show cause why the request shouldn’t be approved.

Rather than argue his case at that court, the former Senate President proceeded to the Court of Appeal. The appellate court was clear: go back to the Federal High Court and argue your case. More importantly, the Court of Appeal cautioned INEC not to take any action that could render the pending suit useless. In simple terms “dont recognize anybody”. Not Mark. Not Nafiu. No faction

.Until the court settles the leadership tussle, there is officially no recognized leadership. INEC didn’t pick sides; it simply obeyed the court. However, in their typical manner, members of the party have been clutching at straws, accusing the electoral body of bias when the real bias and lack of objectivity lies within their own ranks. Rather than going through the legal process dictated by the laws of the land, they have been scheduling press conferences, issuing acerbic statements, and attempting to reap political capital from their own self-inflicted wounds. This move is, for want of a better position, patently illogical.

To the extent that INEC’s action is in tandem with the orders of court, to that extent is its position grouned in law, logic and democratic ethos. There is no basis for an alternative conclusion at the moment.

Thomas Akor a public analyst sent this piece from Gboko, Benue State