News
Reject State Police Bill, Police Welfare Group Tells Tinubu
The Movement for Improved Welfare for Nigeria Police Force (MIWNPF) has called on President Bola Tinubu to withhold assent to the controversial State Police Bill, alleging that the National Assembly passed the proposed legislation without public debate, stakeholder engagement, or input from leading civil society organisations that have long championed police reform and citizens’ security in Nigeria.
In a press statement dated August 4, 2026, and signed by its National Coordinator, Toyin Raheem Prince, the group described the process leading to the passage of the bill as “an affront to over 200 million Nigerians,” insisting that a law with far-reaching implications for Nigeria’s security architecture should not have been enacted without extensive public participation.
According to MIWNPF, the proposed legislation is expected to be transmitted to President Tinubu for presidential assent, but the organisation urged the President to reject the bill until Nigerians and relevant stakeholders are given an opportunity to debate its provisions.
The statement read, “The Movement for Improved Welfare for Nigeria Police Force (MIWNPF) is aware that a bill for the creation of state police is about to be transmitted to Mr President by the National Assembly.
“We are alarmed that this Bill was processed with no public debate, no stakeholder engagement, and no input from the very organisations that have spent years working on police reform and citizens’ security in Nigeria.”
The organisation said it was excluded from the legislative process alongside several prominent civil society groups actively involved in security sector reforms.
Among the organisations listed were the Rule of Law and Accountability Advocacy Centre (RULAC), Network on Police Reform in Nigeria (NOPRIN), CLEEN Foundation, Civil Liberties Organisation (CLO), Campaign for Constitutionalism and Human Rights (CCHR), Centre for Citizens with Disabilities (CCD), Centre for People’s Defence (CPD), Campaign for Democracy and Justice (CDJ), United Action for Democracy (UAD), Committee for the Defence of Human Rights (CDHR), Coalition Against Corruption and Bad Governance (CACOBAG), Democratic Socialist Movement (DSM), Nigeria Democratic Security Coalition (CNDSRC), and several others.
The group questioned why such organisations were not invited to make submissions before lawmakers.
“No public hearing was called. How can a law that will affect the security architecture of over 200 million Nigerians be passed in this manner?” the group asked.
MIWNPF argued that Nigeria is currently not prepared for the establishment of state police, warning that the proposed structure could easily be abused by state governors for political purposes.
It stated that, given Nigeria’s current political environment, state police could become instruments for intimidating opposition figures, manipulating elections, and settling political disputes.
“Risk of Political Misuse. In our current political climate, state police will become a tool in the hands of sitting governors to intimidate opponents, rig elections, and settle political scores. We have already seen the misuse of existing state-backed security outfits,” the organisation stated.
The group also warned that introducing another policing structure would worsen confusion within Nigeria’s already fragmented internal security framework.
It noted that various regional and state-backed security outfits already exist across the country, including the Western Nigeria Security Network (Amotekun) in the South-West, the Oodua People’s Congress (OPC), Hisbah religious police operating in Kano, Jigawa, Katsina, Zamfara and other northern states, the Ebubeagu Security Network in the South-East, as well as numerous community policing and vigilante groups.
According to the organisation, creating state police without first reforming and harmonising these existing structures would breed rivalry, duplication of responsibilities, and abuse of power.
The group also questioned the practical relevance of establishing state police when each state already has a Commissioner of Police appointed to oversee federal policing operations.
“Today, every state has a Commissioner of Police (CP) as the head of the federal police in the state. If we now create ‘State Police’ with a different head by another name, what changes? The structure remains the same, but accountability becomes weaker. Is that true federalism?” MIWNPF queried.
Drawing comparisons with other countries, MIWNPF argued that successful state policing systems operate within nations that possess stronger democratic institutions, independent judicial systems, autonomous local governments, and adequate funding.
The organisation cited the United States and Germany as examples of countries where decentralised policing works because institutional safeguards are firmly established.
Meanwhile, it pointed to Ghana, Rwanda and Kenya, where largely centralised policing systems have recorded significant reform successes.
According to the group, Nigeria’s policing crisis stems not from centralisation but from chronic underfunding, poor welfare, inadequate equipment, weak accountability mechanisms, and political interference.
Rather than creating state police, MIWNPF called for comprehensive reforms of the Nigeria Police Force, including increased funding, procurement of modern operational equipment such as patrol vehicles, forensic laboratories, body cameras and ICT infrastructure.
The group also demanded improved life assurance, health insurance, pensions, welfare packages, training programmes, psychological support for officers, merit-based postings, and an end to political interference in policing.
“Until these are fixed, creating state police is putting the cart before the horse,” the organisation said.
MIWNPF further criticised the manner in which the National Assembly handled the legislation, alleging that Nigerians no longer have confidence in the parliament led by Senate President Godswill Akpabio.
The group accused lawmakers of imposing the legislation without democratic consultation.
“The National Assembly cannot pass a Bill of this magnitude without hearing Nigerians. The Senate where ‘ayes have it’ even when the ‘nay’ was as loud as thunder, and the ‘aye’ as faint as a whisper in a crowded market. That is not democracy. That is imposition,” they said.
It added that true federalism should not be equated with the creation of separate state police forces, arguing instead that genuine federalism requires devolution of powers accompanied by responsibility, financial autonomy, and effective oversight mechanisms.
The organisation therefore made three demands.
It urged President Tinubu to withhold assent to the State Police Bill.
The organisation called on the National Assembly to organise a national public debate or town hall meeting on policing in Nigeria, with MIWNPF and all listed civil society organisations invited to participate.
MIWNPF urged the Federal Government to prioritise full implementation of the Nigeria Police Act 2020 by adequately funding and equipping the Nigeria Police Force, improving officers’ welfare, and carrying out comprehensive police reforms before considering any restructuring of the country’s policing system.
“Nigeria deserves security that protects the people, not security that protects politicians,” they added.
News
2027: Elections Can’t Resolve Nigeria’s Crisis, Hold Referendum -IPOB
Ahead of the 2027 general election, the Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB) has dismissed another round of balloting as incapable of resolving what it described as Nigeria’s fundamental political crisis, insisting that the country needs a referendum rather than another change of political leadership.
The separatist group said the question confronting Nigeria goes beyond who emerges president in 2027, arguing that Nigerians should first be given an opportunity to determine whether they want to continue under the existing political arrangement or negotiate a different constitutional future.
In a statement by its spokesperson, Emma Powerful, on Thursday ,IPOB said the debate should not be reduced to a choice among President Bola Tinubu and opposition figures, including Atiku Abubakar and Peter Obi.
It maintained that repeatedly electing different leaders without addressing what it called Nigeria’s foundational problems amounted to “doing same thing over and over again and expecting a different result.”
According to the group, its leader, Nnamdi Kanu, has consistently placed referendum and self-determination at the centre of the agitation. “The peoples trapped in this colonial construction named Nigeria should determine, peacefully and democratically, the future they want.”
IPOB argued that while an election determines who exercises political power for a specified period, a referendum could enable citizens to decide the constitutional framework under which they want to be governed.
IPOB said such a process should not predetermine Nigeria’s break-up, but should give the people an opportunity to choose among remaining together under a new constitution, adopting another federal arrangement or pursuing self-determination.
It drew comparisons with the United Kingdom, citing constitutional votes held in Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland.
The group referred particularly to Scotland’s 2014 independence referendum, the 1997 devolution referendums in Scotland and Wales and the 1998 Northern Ireland vote on the Belfast Agreement.
It also cited the September 14, 2026 memorandum signed in Cardiff by leaders of Plaid Cymru, the Scottish National Party and Sinn Féin, in which the parties asserted the right of their respective peoples to determine their constitutional futures through democratic means. The Cardiff agreement and its self-determination language have been independently reported.
“If referendum can settle constitutional questions in Britain, why should the peoples of Nigeria be permanently denied the same opportunity?” IPOB asked.
The group also cited a recent symbolic vote in Piddington, Oxfordshire, as further evidence of the use of voting to express views on constitutional or territorial questions.
IPOB sought to reinforce its argument with recent comments by former President Olusegun Obasanjo on Africa’s democratic system.
At the Goodluck Jonathan Foundation Democracy Dialogue in Bauchi on August 11, Obasanjo criticised the Western liberal democratic model inherited by African countries, arguing that it lacked sufficient African context and content. His remarks were made at a forum themed, “Beyond Elections: Can Political Parties and the Judiciary Save African Democracy?”
The pro-Biafra group also cited former President Goodluck Jonathan’s previous comments on Nigeria’s historical struggle to achieve national integration following the 1914 amalgamation.
It maintained that the approach to the 2027 election presents another opportunity for the country to confront what it considers the more fundamental question of political consent rather than concentrate solely on the personalities seeking the presidency.
For IPOB, the group said, “the issue is not who governs Nigeria, but what political arrangement the people freely consent to live under.”
News
49 Year Old Docked For Selling Fake Herbal Products In Osun
A 49-year old man, identified as Benjamin Segun Bright, was on Thursday arraigned before an Osogbo Magistrate Court on three-count charge of selling adulterated herbal products.
In the suit number MOS/5531/2026 between the Commissioner of Police and the suspect and others at large were said to have committed the offence on July, 20, 2026, at about 9:30am around Odo-Ola Street, Igbona area. Osogbo, Osun State, within Osogbo Magisterial District.
The Commissioner of Police was represented by Inspector Temitope Fatoba, while Bright was represented by his counsel, K.E Ngwoke.
According to the charge sheet, “Count 1: That you Benjamin Segun Bright ‘M’ and others now at large, on or
before the 20 day of July 2026, at about 9:30am at Odo-Ola Street, Igbona area. Osogbo, Osun State, in the Osogbo Magisterial District, did conspire among
yourselves to commit a felony to wit: Exposing For Sale Things Unfit for Food or Drink Being in Possession of Adulterated/Counterfeit Products and thereby committed an offence contrary to and punishable under Section 517 of the Criminal Code Cap 34 Vol.11 Laws of Osun State, 2002.
“Count 2: That you Benjamin Segun Bright ‘M’ and others now at large, on the
same date, time, place and in the aforementioned Magisterial District, did have in your possession various adulterated tea and drinks such as Bright Life Herbal Tonic (2) Kaye Bitters (3) Bright Life Herbal Teas (4) Atura Herbal Balm and (5) Dr. Fresh Super Bleach with intent to sell the same as food or drink, which said products were in a state unfit for human consumption, noxious and/or unfit for food or drink, and thereby committed an offence contrary to and punishable under Section 243(1) of the Griminal Code Cap 34 Vol.11 Laws of Osun State, 2002.
“Count 3: That you, Benjamin Segun Bright ‘M’ and others now at large, on the
same date, time, place and in the aforementioned Magisterial District, did unlawfully adulterate various tea and drinks such as Bright Life Herbal teas, Bright Life Herbal Tonic intended for sale as food or drink which is unfit for human consumption, knowing that the same were likely to be sold as food or drink, and thereby committed an offence contrary to and punishable under Section 243(2) of the Criminal Code Cap 34 Vol.Il Laws of Osun State, 2002.”
Bright, however, pleaded not guilty and his counsel, Ngwoke moved application for bail on behalf of his counsel.
Presiding Chief Magistrate, Dr Olusegun Ayilara granted the accused bail in the sum of N5 million with two sureties, one of whom must be a house owner with valid identification and ready to deposit title document.
The other surety must be responsible person three years tax clearance while the address must be verifiable by prosecutor or court clerk.
Ayilra subsequently adjourned the matter to November 30, 2026.
News
2027: Ex-Speakers Endorse Tinubu, Launch National Mobilisation
Former Speakers and Deputy Speakers of State Houses of Assembly on Thursday unanimously endorsed President Bola Ahmed Tinubu for a second term and resolved to launch a nationwide grassroots mobilisation for his re-election in 2027.
Under the plan, members of the Forum of Former Presiding Officers of State Houses of Assembly of Nigeria (FOPSHAN) will mobilise across the 36 states and the Federal Capital Territory (FCT), explain the administration’s policies and programmes, and canvass support for the President.
The former legislative leaders also endorsed the administration’s economic reforms, particularly the removal of petrol subsidy, arguing that the immediate difficulties associated with the measures should be weighed against their anticipated long-term benefits.
The resolutions were adopted at FOPSHAN’s National Summit in Abuja, themed: “Bold Leadership, Bold Reforms: From Subsidy to Renewed Hope – Affecting the Economic Trajectory and Digital Leadership of President Bola Ahmed Tinubu’s Administration”.
Former Senate President Pius Anyim chaired the summit, while First Lady Senator Oluremi Tinubu attended as Special Guest of Honour.
The forum’s National Chairman, Senator Wasiu Eshilokun Sani, hosted the gathering.
Ebonyi State Governor, Francis Ogbonna Nwifuru, a former Speaker of the Ebonyi State House of Assembly, chairs the forum’s Board of Trustees.
In its resolutions, the forum declared its support for what it described as the administration’s “bold economic reforms”, particularly petrol subsidy removal, saying the policy should be viewed within the broader objective of securing long-term economic prosperity.
It subsequently announced a unanimous endorsement of Tinubu’s second-term bid.
“In recognition of the President’s colourful, visionary leadership and commitment to national development, FOPSHAN unanimously endorses President Bola Ahmed Tinubu, GCFR, for a second term in office in the 2027 general elections”, the resolution stated.
The forum resolved to move beyond the endorsement by deploying its membership across the country to build grassroots support for the administration.
Former legislators at the national, state, and local government levels are expected to engage citizens, explain government policies and programmes, and take the summit’s message to communities across the 36 states and the FCT.
FOPSHAN also appealed to the First Lady to enlist its members as ambassadors for the administration’s social intervention programmes, particularly initiatives targeting women, children and vulnerable Nigerians.
The former presiding officers further urged the President and state governors to make greater use of their legislative and governance experience in appointments and policy formulation.
“The conference calls on the President and governors to continue to tap into the wealth of legislative experience of former presiding officers in appointments and policy formulation for the good governance of the country”, the resolution stated.
On party affairs, the forum reaffirmed its commitment to the unity and progress of the All Progressives Congress (APC), urging members to close ranks and support the administration at the federal and sub-national levels.
Earlier, Nwifuru said former legislative leaders could not afford to become spectators in national affairs after leaving office, arguing that their experience should continue to strengthen governance and democratic institutions.
Drawing from his years as Speaker of the Ebonyi State House of Assembly before becoming governor, Nwifuru stressed the importance of cooperation between the executive and legislature.
“Those years taught me an enduring lesson. Governance is not the responsibility of the executive alone; it is a partnership between institutions”, he said.
Nwifuru said the ultimate objective of the ongoing economic reforms should be to expand Nigeria’s productive capacity and create opportunities for citizens, particularly young people.
“We must invest in agriculture, manufacturing, infrastructure, education, energy and technology. We must create an environment where Nigerians can produce more, businesses can grow, and young people can find meaningful opportunities,” he said.
The governor also called for stronger legislative oversight, greater fiscal responsibility, stronger democratic institutions and further devolution of powers.
He said the experience former Speakers and Deputy Speakers accumulated placed them in a position to continue contributing to governance beyond their years in legislative office.
“We have occupied the chambers where laws are made, scrutinised and voices of our constituents were amplified. We therefore cannot afford to be spectators in the journey of national development”, Nwifuru said.
He urged the former lawmakers to deploy their legislative experience, networks, and understanding of governance to strengthen democratic development and promote accountability in public administration.
-
Health & Wellness1 year agoPresident Tinubu Directs Cut in Dialysis Cost from ₦50,000 to ₦12,000
-
News1 year agoPICTURE: In Lagos Couple Sentenced to 22½ Years for Cannabis Trafficking
-
Business6 months agoDangote Refinery Reduces Petrol Gantry Price To ₦1,200 Per Litre
-
Trending News1 year agoNELFUND Disburses ₦86bn To 449,000 Beneficiaries
-
Business2 years agoHeritage Bank Customers’ Path to Securing ₦5m Insured Funds: A Step-By-Step Guide by NDIC”
-
Business2 years ago
Dangote; We Did Not Fix ₦600/Litre Petrol Price
-
International News6 months agoIndian Police Arrest Nigerian Over ₦290m Drug Haul
-
Business6 months agoAfter Plea Bargain, Court Discharges Stella Oduah of ₦2.5bn Fraud
