Connect with us

International News

How EU Is Responding To Trump’s Trade Assault

Published

on

Spread the love
European Union logo

by three waves of painful US tariffs since President Donald Trump returned to office, the European Union’s response has been a high-wire act, balancing calibrated retaliation with a push for negotiations to avert an all-out trade war.

– In March, Trump fired his first shot against the 27-country European Union with 25 percent levies on steel and aluminium imports;

– He then slapped 25-percent tariffs on all foreign-made cars, in effect since last week;

– And in his biggest move, Trump ordered 20 percent tariffs on all other EU goods among a raft of levies on dozens of countries including China, which came into force Wednesday.

 What steps is the EU taking?

The EU’s approach so far has been think first, then act.

After the metals tariffs hit in March, it gave itself a month to fine-tune a list of US goods to target — ranging from soybeans to makeup and motorcycles, and weighted towards states held by Trump’s Republicans.

EU capitals are to green light this list during a meeting Wednesday. Once approved, the majority of the tariffs will kick in in May, and some in December.

Meanwhile, the EU will let levies dating from Trump’s first term — but currently suspended — snap back into place in mid-April.

Next will come the bloc’s response to the sweeping 20-percent import taxes and tariffs on cars, which could be made public as early as next week.

There has been no public indication of how the EU will respond, but France has led the push with Germany and Austria to target US tech titans if negotiations come to nought.

France and Germany have gone further, pushing the EU to be prepared to deploy its so-called trade “bazooka” — the anti-coercion instrument.

The new and yet unused tool is designed to punish any country using economic threats to exert pressure on the EU, once diplomacy fails, and gives the bloc greater powers including limiting trade on services.

 What about negotiations?

What Europe wants above all is to reach a negotiated solution.

“Sooner or later, we’ll be sitting at the negotiating table,” the EU’s trade chief Maros Sefcovic said Monday, while admitting that “engaging the US will take both time and effort.”

A quiet unassuming figure, Sefcovic has led the EU’s outreach in search of a “mutually acceptable compromise”.

He has gone to Washington twice — in February and March — and held calls with his US counterparts, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick and Trade Representative Jamieson Greer.

EU chief Ursula von der Leyen this week offered a glimpse into what Europe has put on the table so far, revealing it offered Washington a bilateral tariff exemption for cars and other industrial goods. The response was not positive.

Officials privately admit that there has been little progress in the EU’s talks with the United States, pointing to an unclear picture of what Trump really wants.

One issue could be whether the bloc is talking to the right people.

Trump’s trade advisor, Peter Navarro, appears to be far more influential on the issue than Lutnick or Greer, but EU officials say he has not been a part of the discussions.

 What else might Trump want?

Navarro, believed to be the architect of Trump’s trade offensive, has made it clear he is deeply unhappy with the EU, lambasting a series of “non-tariff” barriers Washington deems unfair.

US officials have set their sights on value-added tax (VAT) but also the EU’s food safety and health rules, and its environmental standards.

“Anybody who wants to come to talk to us, talk to us about lowering your non-tariff barriers,” Navarro said in a Monday interview.

He has also taken umbrage with the EU’s landmark tech laws, the Digital Markets Act and the Digital Services Act, claiming they unfairly target American companies.

The EU has pushed back hard on the VAT and tech claims.

“(We) don’t share the US assessment of what constitutes a non-tariff barrier,” EU spokesman Olof Gill said Tuesday.

He added European tech rules were “separate” from the tariff discussions. “We will not be conflating the two in our negotiations with the US.”

The threat of more duties is far from over. Trump also has the pharma sector in his crosshairs — a critical industry for the EU, especially Ireland.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

AFP

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

International News

Nigeria Missing As Saudi Arabia Names African Countries Eligible For eVisa

Published

on

Spread the love

 

Saudi Arabia has updated its tourist eVisa programme for 2026, limiting eligibility in Africa to only three countries as part of its list of 66 nations whose citizens can apply through the Kingdom’s online visa platform.

 

The move leaves most African countries, including Nigeria, outside the simplified entry scheme.

The electronic visa allows eligible travellers to visit Saudi Arabia for tourism, leisure activities, family visits and Umrah, excluding the annual Hajj pilgrimage. Applications are completed online, eliminating the need for embassy visits and lengthy visa processing.

Saudi authorities said the eVisa forms part of ongoing efforts to expand tourism, attract international visitors and simplify travel procedures through a fully digital application system. The visa is available only to citizens of approved countries and territories listed on the Kingdom’s official tourism portal.

Below is the list of African countries eligible for Saudi Arabia’s eVisa.

1. Mauritius

2. Seychelles

3. South Africa

Continue Reading

International News

South Africa Says Over 53,000 Deported In Migration Campaign

Published

on

Spread the love

 

The South African government says more than 53,000 foreign nationals have been deported or repatriated since launching a “migration management” campaign five weeks ago.

Most were from Malawi, Zimbabwe, and Mozambique, officials say, and the number is likely to rise as repatriations and deportations continue.

South Africa is carrying out one of its biggest crackdowns on undocumented migrants in years, following weeks of anti-immigration protests that have seen violence, intimidation and looting.

Protesters have been demanding tighter border controls and mass deportations, accusing migrants of contributing to high unemployment, rising crime rates and collapse of public services.

The UN has warned against using migrants as scapegoats for South Africa’s socioeconomic challenges.

Anti-migrant activists have threatened to stage weekly protests to pressure the government until their demands are met, and there are fears the protests could turn violent.

The demonstrators had set an “unofficial deadline” of 30 June for all undocumented migrants to leave the country, which has seen many foreigners leave to escape violence and intimidation.

Several countries, including Ghana, Nigeria, Uganda and Kenya, have flown their citizens home in recent weeks.

Justice and Constitutional Development Minister Mmamoloko Kubayi announced on Sunday that 53,499 foreign nationals have been processed for deportation and repatriation, “which is dominated by the Malawians, followed by Zimbabweans and Mozambicans”.

“We are striving to achieve an orderly and regular migration which is mindful and sensitive to the concerns raised by our people, while observing human rights and dignity of all people in our country, irrespective of their citizenship and immigration status,” Kubayi told a news conference in Pretoria.

She said the repatriation and deportation process has helped them catch people who were wanted by the police for alleged criminal activity.

Authorities will continue to enforce its immigration laws, she added, but warned that protesters should not conduct unauthorised searches of homes and businesses that are suspected of sheltering undocumented migrants.

South Africa’s President Cyril Ramaphosa has acknowledged public concerns about immigration but has condemned attacks against migrants, warning citizens against taking the law into their own hands.

South Africa is the continent’s wealthiest nation and has long attracted migrants searching for better economic opportunities, some of whom enter the country illegally.

Continue Reading

International News

FIFA Boss,Infantino Plans 64-Team World Cup

Published

on

Spread the love

 

Plans for a 64-team men’s World Cup are set to be assessed after the 2026 tournament, with Fifa boss Gianni Infantino saying the event needs to be “for the whole world”.

 

The proposal for an expanded tournament was put forward last year, and Infantino says the success of the expanded 48-team tournament means Fifa should look at how a 64-team World Cup could work.

“These are all issues that we will be examining after the World Cup,” Infantino told Swiss broadcaster Blue Sport, external when asked if the tournament could grow to 64 teams.

“When organising a World Cup, it’s important to organise it for the whole world – not just Europe and South America, but effectively the entire world. Every nation should be allowed to dream of participating in the World Cup.

“You can see that the quality of the teams is extremely high, and it’s getting higher and higher, all over the world. If you don’t give smaller countries a chance to participate in the World Cup, they’ll lack the incentive to keep improving.”

Infantino said that the first 48-team World Cup has been “a huge success”, citing the progression of nine out of 10 African teams to the knockout stages.

“At the last World Cup, there were only five teams from Africa,” he said. “That just goes to show how important it is to include all teams – to give them this opportunity to participate.”

The Fifa council approved the expansion of the World Cup from 32 to 48 teams in 2017.

An official proposal to boost the 2030 World Cup to 64 teams was put forward by South American governing body Conmebol in April 2025, but no decision has been reached.

The 2030 edition will be mainly co-hosted by Spain, Portugal and Morocco, with the three opening matches to be hosted by Argentina, Uruguay and Paraguay to celebrate the centenary of the competition. Uruguay hosted the first World Cup, in 1930.

Uefa president Aleksander Ceferin is among those to have dismissed the 64-team proposal, with the Slovenian saying it is a “bad idea” for both the tournament itself and the qualifying process.

Asian Football Confederation (AFC) president Sheikh Salman bin Ibrahim Al Khalifa agreed, saying further expansion would bring “chaos”.

Victor Montagliani, president of the governing body for football in North and Central America and the Caribbean (Concacaf), said the suggestion “doesn’t feel right” and he believes the expansion would damage “the broader football ecosystem”.

However, Andrew Giuliani, executive director of the White House’s World Cup task force, said the United States could consider making a bid to host the 2038 World Cup and would be able to “handle it” if expanded to 64 teams.

Fifa’s official position has always been it will discuss expansion ideas with stakeholders and it is duty bound to consider any proposals from council members.

The Fifa council would make the ultimate decision, but there are no signs it is something expected to happen imminently.

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2026 TheColumn NG